Affordances of Outdoor Risky Play in a Traditional and a Forest Kindergarten

Teresa Parczewska

doi:10.18290/rped24161.8

Published : 2024-04-17

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024)

Affordances of Outdoor Risky Play in a Traditional and a Forest Kindergarten

Teresa Parczewska

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-5519

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rped24161.8

Abstract

The article aims to qualitatively examine the affordances of children’s risky play in two different Polish kindergartens, based on Gibson’s (1979) theory of affordances and extended work on this theory by other researchers (Heft,1988; Kyttä, 2002, 2004). Observations of risky play were made in a traditional facility, where children played in a traditional playground, and in a forest facility playground, where children played in nature, in an adventure forest playground (Bubble, 2002; Lee, 1999). The research methods included observation, semi-structured interviews with children, interviews with staff, and visual methods (video recordings using KB 176 mini personal recorders attached to children’s clothing in the forest kindergarten and the traditional kindergarten). The data showed the current affordances of risky play and its limitations. I found that the studied play environments (traditional and forest kindergarten) allow children to engage in risky activities, and the degree of staff permission to move freely is an important factor in actualizing the affordances. I have recognized that differences in the quality and characteristics of the two environments have important implications for the affordances of risky play. The natural playground in the forest facility provided a significantly higher degree of risk in children’s play activities.

Keywords:

affordances, risky play, children, forest kindergarten and traditional kindergarten, play environment

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Ball, D. J. (2002). Playgrounds - Risks, benefits and choices (Contract research report no. 426/2002). Middlesex University.

Bańka, A. (2002). Społeczna psychologia środowiskowa. Scholar.

Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Pearson.

Brudzińska, P. (2022). Przestrzeń zabaw ryzykownych w przedszkolu leśnym [Space for risky play in a forest kindergarten]. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 54(1), 120–134.

Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 5(1), 68–80.

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data complementary research strategies. Sage.

Clough, P., & Nutbrown, K. (2012). A student’s guide to methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications.

Fjørtoft, I. (2000). Landscape and playscape. Learning effects from playing in a natural environment on motor development in children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin.

Gill, T. (2007). No fear. Growing up in a risk averse society. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 29–37. http://www.playworksoutheast. org.uk/extrainfo/stuartnotes.pdf

Hughes, B. (1990). Children’s play – a forgotten right. Environment and Urbanization, 2(2), 58–64.

Jambor, T. (1998). Challenge and risk-taking in play. In D. P. Fromberg & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve and beyond. Contexts, perspectives and meanings (pp. 319–323). Garland Publishing; Taylor & Francis.

Kaarby, K. M. E. (2004). Children playing in nature [Conference presentation]. CECDE conference: Questions of Quality, Dublin Castle.

Kyttä, M. (2002). Affordances of children’s environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 109–123.

Kyttä, M. (2003). Children in outdoor context. Affordances and Independent Mobility in the Assessment of Environmental Child Friendliness [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Technology; Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Helsinki, Finland.

Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 179–198.

Kyttä, M. (2008). Children in outdoor contexts affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

Lee, S.-H. (1999). The cognition of playground safety and children’s play – a comparison of traditional, contemporary, and naturalized playground types. In M. L. Christiansen (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference of playground safety. Penn State University: Center for Hospitality, Tourism & Recreation Research.

Lester, S. (2007). Risky play, risky playwork [Conference proceedings]. Spirit of Play Conference 2007, SkillsActive South East England’s annual conference.

Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Sandseter, E. B. H. (2007). Categorizing risky play – How can we identify risk-taking in children’s play? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 237–252.

Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009). Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 3–21.

Sandseter, E. B. H., Kleppe R., & Sando O. J. (2021). The prevalence of risky play in young children’s indoor and outdoor free play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(6), 303–312.