There Is More to Learning Words than Meets the Conscious Eye

Konrad Szcześniak

doi:10.18290/rh237110sp-7

Published : 2023-11-24

Vol. 71 No. 10sp (2023)

There Is More to Learning Words than Meets the Conscious Eye

Konrad Szcześniak

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-4983

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh237110sp-7

Abstract

This study focuses on the role of attention in learning new language items. These include elements of varying size and schematicity, ranging from single morphemes, through words, phrases, partially-filled sequences, to entirely schematic grammatical patterns. Following cognitive-linguistic usage-based models, it is assumed that language learning takes place by observing examples of use found in the input and whose elements must be memorised. Given the nature of linguistic use and the deluge of information to which the learner is exposed at any moment, learning is highly unlikely to involve only a continuous focus of consciousness. Thus, the present contribution argues against the main claims of Richard Schmidt’s Noticing Hypothesis, under which learning is only possible when consciously attending to input elements. On the contrary, the development of proficiency is based mainly on unconscious learning mechanisms. The acquisition of phraseological compounds is particularly dependent on incidental learning.

Keywords:

conscious attention, formulaic language, use-based language acquisition

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82.

Augustinova, M., & Ludovic, F. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 343–348.

Baars, B. J. (2002). The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 47–52.

Balota, D. A., Law, M. B., & Zevin, J. D. (2000). The attentional control of lexical processing pathways: Reversing the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1081–1089.

Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2012). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 73–79.

Besner, D., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., White D., Reynolds, M., O’Malley S., & Robidoux, S. (2016). Varieties of attention: Their roles in visual word identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 162–168.

Bordag, D., Opitz, A., Polter, M., & Meng, M. (2021). Non-native readers are more sensitive to changes in surface linguistic information than native readers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(4), 1–13.

Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 453–482). Erlbaum.

Bybee, Joan. (2003). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 145–167). Erlbaum.

Bybee, Joan. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Christian, Kimberly M. (2010). Cerebellum: Associative learning. In G. F. Koob, M. Le Moal, & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral neuroscience (pp. 242–248). Academic Press.

Christiansen, M. H., & Arnon, I. (2017). More than words: The role of multiword sequences in language learning and use. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 542–551.

Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. University of Chicago Press.

Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca.

Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. Viking Penguin.

Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.

Gass, Susan M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Routledge.

Goldberg, A. (2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.

Gurevich, O., Johnson, M. A., & Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 45–78.

Hasher, L., & Chromiak, W. (1977). The processing of frequency information: An automatic mechanism? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 173–184.

Heyes, C. (2012). Simple minds: A qualified defence of associative learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367(1603), 2695–2703.

Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press.

Kuldas, S., Ismail, H. N., Hashim, S., & Abu Bakar, Z. (2013). Unconscious learning processes: Mental integration of verbal and pictorial instructional materials. Springerplus, 2(1), 1–14.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.

Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer: The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Benjamins.

Malkiel, Y. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua, 8, 113–160.

McTavish, M. (2008). What were you thinking? The use of metacognitive strategy during engagement with reading narrative and informational genres. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 405–430.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9(1), 7–25.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. G. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). Longman.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. Chan, K. Chin, S. Kumar Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27–50). Mouton de Gruyter.

Szcześniak, K. (2022). Memory of formulaic sequences in L2 retention of chunks featuring inchoative uses of unaccusative verbs. Linguistica Silesiana, 43, 43–64.

Taylor, J. (2012). The mental corpus. How language is represented in the mind. Oxford University Press.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.

Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14(2), 103–135.

Wray, A. (2001). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.

Wyeth, P. (2015). The matter of vision: Affective neurobiology & cinema. Indiana University Press.