Analysis and Interpretation of the Results of Interaction in a Respondents’ Subgroup according to Sibling Position in the Nuclear Family

Hanna  Krupnyk

doi:10.18290/rt226910.5

Published : 2024-12-28

Vol. 69 No. 10 (2022)

Analysis and Interpretation of the Results of Interaction in a Respondents’ Subgroup according to Sibling Position in the Nuclear Family

Hanna Krupnyk

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-1340

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rt226910.5

Abstract

The article provides a review of the modern nuclear family’s condition. I analyse scholarly works by leading local and foreign scientists in the line of parent–child, sibling relations. The peculiarities of the interaction between children and parents are highlighted from the position of the respondents, who have been grouped into subgroups according to the order of birth in the family hierarchy (N = 265). The choice of methods for studying the family interaction of the respondents has been found. The aim is to study the level of development of parent–child and sibling relations, and compare the results in the “The first/middle/last child” subgroups. The methods are questionnaires used to establish the level of parent–child and sibling relationships; the statistical processing of empirical data and graphical presentation of the results were done using MS Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 27.0). The main positions based on the results of our research will be put into the basis for the development of specific recommendations, which will be useful and helpful in further work of practicing psychologists in the field of family counseling in such subsystems as marital sibling and parent-child relationships.

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Alekseev, Anatoly,and Larisa Hromova. “Psykhoheometryia dlia menedzherov.” Moscow: Znanye, 1991.

Almazova, Olga. Pryviazannost k matery kak faktor vzaymootnoshenyi vzroslykh syblynhov. Doctoral dissertation. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2015.

Bedford, Victoria. “Sibling Relationship Troubles and Well-Being in Middle and Old Age.” Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies 47 (1998): 369–78.

Blynova, Olena. “Osoblyvosti dytiacho-batkivskykh vidnosyn u sim’iakh trudovykh mihrantiv”. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii, no. 2 (2015): 30–37.

Diduk, Inna. Vzaiemyny mizh ditmy v sim’i yak chynnyk yikh psykhosotsialnoho rozvytku. Doctoral dissertation. Kyiv: Kostyuk Institute of Psychology, 2001.

Еidemyller, Еdmond, and Victoras Yustytskys. Psykholohyia y psykhoterapyia sim’i. 2nd ed. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 1999.

Hank, Karsten, and Anja Steinbach. “Intergenerational Solidarity and Intragenerational Relations between Adult Siblings.” Social Science Research 76 (2018): 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.003.

Jensen, Alexander, and Susan MChale. “Mothers’, Fathers’, and Siblings’ Perceptions of Parents’ Differential Treatment of Siblings: Links with Family Relationship Qualities.” Journal of Adolescence 60 (2017): 119–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.002.

Karpa, Maria. “Vplyv naiavnosti nepovnospravnoi dytyny v sim’i na psykhosotsialnyi rozvytok yii syblinhiv.” Naukovi zapysky Instytutu psykholohii im. H.S. Kostiuka APN Ukrainy 26, no. 2 (2005): 223–27.

Korzhova, Elena. Metodyka „Psykholohycheskaia avtobyohrafyia” v psykhodyahnostyke zhyznennуkh sytuatsyi: Metodycheskoe posobye. Kyiv: MAUP, 1994.

Kozlova, Iryna. “Osobennosty syblynhovykh otnoshenyi v dvukhdetnykh semiakh.” Psykholohycheskye yssledovanyia 4 (2010). Accessed September 24, 2021. http://psystudy.ru.

Krupnyk, Hanna. “Vzaiemyny u nuklearnii sim’i mizh syblinhamy ta yikh batkamy.” In Psykholohichni resursy v umovakh zhyttievoi ta suspilnoi kryzy: Sotsialnyi ta osobystisnyi vymiry, edited by Olena Blynova and Victoria Kazibekova. Kherson: FOP Vyshemyrskyi, 2021.

Krupnyk, Hanna. “Empirychno-metodychne zabezpechennia vyvchennia chynnykiv, shcho vplyvaiut na rozvytok mizhosobystisnykh stosunkiv syblinhiv.” Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii 6, no. 1 (2019): 127–31.

Krupnyk, Hanna. “Ohliad suchasnykh zakordonnykh doslidzhen u simeinii syblinhovii pidsystemi.” Sotsiokulturni ta psykholohichni vymiry stanovlennia osobystosti. Materials of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kherson, September 26–27, 2019, edited by Olena Blynova and Natalia Tavrovetska, 139–42. Kherson: Kherson State University, FOP Vyshemyrsky V.S., 2019.

Krupnyk, Ivan. “Problemy doslidzhennia osoblyvostei uiavlen pro maibutnie simeine zhyttia ditei z rodyn trudovykh mihrantiv”. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Series: Psykhol. nauky 1, no. 1 (2016): 146–50.

Kuzmyna, Maria. “Syblynhy, yly Kayn y Avel v odnoi kvartyre.” Shkolnyi psykholoh 17 (2000). Accessed September 24, 2021. http://www.psy.1september.ru/?year=2000&num=17.

Markovskaia, Irina. “Oprosnyk dlia yzuchenyia vzaymodeistvyia rodytelei s detmy.” Semeinaia psykholohyia y semeinaia terapyia 2 (1999): 94–108.

Mostafa, Tarek, Ludovica Gambaro, and Heather Joshi. “The Impact of Complex Family Structure on Child Well-being: Evidence from Siblings.” Journal of Marriage and Family 80, no. 4 (2017): 902–18.

Bodalev, Aleksey, and Vladimir Stolyn, eds., Obshchaia psykhodyahnostyka. Moscow: MHU, 1987.

Posvistak, Olesia. Teoretyko-istorychni osnovy psykholohii sim’i. Khmelnytskyi: Khmelnytskyi National Univrsity, 2017.

“Praktykum po psykholohycheskoi dyahnostyke semeinнkh otnoshenyi: uchebno-metodycheskyi kompleks”,edited by V. I. Slepkovа and T. A. Zaeko. Minsk: Belarusian State Pedagogical University Named after Maxim Tank, 2002.

Serheeva, Anastasia, Bogdan Kyryllov, and Alena Dzhumahulova. “Perevod y adaptatsyia kratkoho piatyfaktornoho oprosnyka lychnosty (TIPI-RU): otsenka konverhentnoi valydnosty, vnutrennei sohlasovannosty y test-retestovoi nadezhnosty.” Eksperymentalnaia psykholohyia/Experimental psychology 9, no. 3 (2016): 138–54. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2016090311

Tsiura, Svitlana. “Kharakterni osoblyvosti pedahohichnoho seredovyshcha rozvytku syblinhiv.” Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Series: Pedahohichna 30 (2016): 149–51.

Voskresenska, Olena. “Vplyv batkiv na konkurentni vidnosyny syblinhiv.” Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Series: Pedahohichni nauky. Cherkasy: Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy (2008): 149–51.

Yablonska, Tetyana, Oksana Artyukh, and Julia Gorbaniuk. “Family Values of Contemporary Ukrainian Youth in Across-Cultural Context”. Roczniki Teologiczne 67 (2020): 159–74.

Yablonska, Tetyana.“Aktualni problemy doslidzhen suchasnoi sim’i v Ukraini.” Ukrainskyi sotsium 2, no. 4 (2004): 80–84.

Yucel, Deniz, Donna Bobbitt-Zeher, and Douglas Downey. “Quality Matters: Sibling Relationships and Friendship Nominations among Adolescents.” Child Indicators Research 11 (2018): 523–39.