Compounding with a Polymorphic Deverbaliser in Turkish

Furkan Dikmen; Ömer Demirok

doi:10.18290/rh237111-4s

Data publikacji : 2023-07-27

Tom 71 Nr 11sp (2023)

Tworzenie złożeń z polimorficznym elementem eliminującym właściwości czasownikowe w tureckim

Furkan Dikmen

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-3612

Ömer Demirok

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-5247

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh237111-4s

Abstrakt

Artykuł poświęcony jest złożeniom z nominalnym członem głównym w tureckim, tworzonym za pomocą sufiksu -Im, który eliminuje właściwości czasownikowe. Nasza główna obserwacja polega na tym, że złożenia te, w swojej polimorficznej strukturze, przypominają zarówno takie złożenia, jak home-made ‘domowy’ i takie, jak cake-baking ‘pieczenie ciasta’. Twierdzimy, że temat słowotwórczy ma w tych złożeniach specjalny status, sugerujący, że bazą dla -Im nie może być prosty predykat zdarzenia, ponieważ derywatowi towarzyszy struktura argumentowa. Ponieważ proponujemy model semantyki kompozycyjnej dla złożeń tworzonych z -Im, mamy nadzieję wziąć udział w debacie dotyczącej zagadnienia, czy bazy rzeczowników dewerbalnych mogą posiadać strukturę argumentową, czy też nie.

Słowa kluczowe:

nominalizacja, złożenia, afiksacja, wysokość, struktura argumentowa

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Alexiadou, Artemis, and Hagit Borer. “Introduction.” Nominalization: 50 Years on from Chomsky’s Remarks, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and Hagit Borer, Oxford UP, 2020, pp. 1–23.

Arslan-Kechriotis, Ceyda. Case as an Uninterpretable Feature. Boğaziçi U, 2006. PhD dissertation.

Arslan-Kechriotis, Ceyda. Determiner Phrase and Case in Turkish: A Minimalist Account. VDM Publishing House, 2009.

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts. “Passive Arguments Raised.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 2, 1989, pp. 219–51.

Borer, Hagit. “In the Event of a Nominal.” The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, edited by Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj, and Tal Siloni, Oxford UP, 2012, pp. 103–49.

Bošković, Željko, and Serkan Şener. “The Turkish NP.” Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, edited by Patricia C. Hofherr and Anne Zribi-Hertz, Brill, 2014, pp. 102–40.

Bruening, Benjamin. “By Phrases in Passives and Nominals.” Syntax, vol. 16, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–41.

Carlson, Gregory N. Reference to Kinds in English. 1977. U of Massachusetts, PhD dissertation.

Chierchia, Gennaro. “Reference to Kinds across Language.” Natural Language Semantics, vol. 5, no. 4, 1998, p. 339–405.

Chung, Sandra, and William A. Ladusaw. Restriction and Saturation. MIT Press, 2003.

Demirok, Ömer. “A Semantic Characterization of Turkish Nominalizations.” Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Richard Stockwell at al., Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2019, pp. 132–42.

Grimm, Scott, and Louise McNally. “The -ing Dynasty: Rebuilding the Semantics of Nominalizations.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 25, 2015, pp. 82–102. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3070.

Grimshaw, Jane. Argument Structure. MIT Press, 1990.

Göksel, Aslı. “Compounds in Turkish.” Lingue e linguaggio, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009, p. 213–36.

Harley, Heidi. “Compounding in Distributed Morphology.” The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, edited by Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer, Oxford UP, 2009, pp. 129–44.

Jaeggli, Osvaldi. “Passive.” Linguistic Inquiry, 1986, pp. 587–622.

Kornfilt, Jaklin. “Subject Case in Turkish Nominalized Clauses.” Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information, edited by Uwe Junghanns and Luka Szucsich, Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, pp. 129–216.

Kratzer, Angelika. “Severing the External Argument from its Verb.” Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, edited by Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, Springer, 1996, pp. 109–37.

Kunduracı, Aysun. Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds: A Process-Based Paradigmatic Account. 2013. University of Calgary, PhD dissertation.

Kural, Murat. “V-to (-I-to)-C in Turkish.” UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, vol. 11, 1993, pp. 17–54.

Lasersohn, Peter. Plurality, Conjunction, and Events. Springer, 1995.

Lewis, Geoffrey. Turkish Grammar. Oxford UP, 1967.

Lieber, Rochelle. “Argument Linking and Compounds in English.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 14, no. 2, 1983, p. 251–85.

Lieber, Rochelle. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge UP, 2004.

Link, Godehard. “The logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach.” Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, edited by Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, De Gruyter, 1983, pp. 302–23.

Marantz, Alec. “No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of your own Lexicon.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 2, 1997, pp. 201–25.

Öztürk, Balkız, and Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan. “Possessive Constructions in Turkish.” Lingua, vol. 182, 2016, pp. 88–108.

Perlmutter, David M. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 4, 1978, pp. 157–89.

Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal. “Toward a Universal Characterization of Passivization.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 3, 1977, p. 394–417.

Roeper, Thomas, and Muffy E. A. Siegel. “A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 9, no. 2, 1978, pp. 199–260.

Sağ, Yağmur. “Bare Singulars and Singularity in Turkish.” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 45, 2021, p. 741–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-021-09323-0.

Sağ, Yağmur. The Semantics of Number Marking: Reference to Kinds, Counting, and Optional Classifiers. Rutgers University, 2019. PhD dissertation.

Sağ, Yağmur. “The Semantics of Turkish Numeral Constructions.” Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 22, 2018, p. 307–24.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. The Syntax of Words. MIT Press, 1982.

Hayashi, Tooru. “The Dual Status of Possessive Compounds in Modern Turkish.” Symbolæ Turcologicæ, vol. 6, 1996, pp. 119–29.

Wood, Jim. “Prepositional Prefixing and Allosemy in Nominalizations.” Nominalization: 50 Years on from Chomsky’s Remarks, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and Hagit Borer, Oxford UP, 2020, pp. 391–418.

Wood, Jim. Icelandic Nominalizations and Allosemy. Ms. Yale, 2020.

Wood, Jim. “Verbs without Verb Phrases: Deverbal Nominalizations as Complex Heads.” Paper given at JENom 9, 17–18 June, 2021, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Yükseker, Hitay. “Possessive Constructions in Turkish.” The Mainz Meeting: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Turkish Linguistics, edited by Lars Johanson et al., Harrassowitz, 1998, pp. 458–77.