On Understandings of Politeness in Greek, Again!

Maria Sifianou

doi:10.18290/rh237106.12s

Data publikacji : 2023-07-24

Tom 71 Nr 6sp (2023)

Ponownie o rozumieniu kategorii grzeczności językowej w grece

Maria Sifianou

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-937X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh237106.12s

Abstrakt

Najnowsze podejścia w teorii dyskursu do pojęcia nie/grzeczności językowej podkreślają znaczenie pozanaukowego rozumienia tych pojęć. Idąc za tą koncepcją badawczą, w artykule zgromadzono dane pochodzące z kwestionariusza przeznaczonego dla 100 studentek studiów licencjackich. Respondentki poproszono o podanie wybranych atrybutów osoby określanej mianem grzecznej (uprzejmej) oraz podanie przykładów osób lub zachowań, które odbierają jako wyraz grzeczności (uprzejmości). Celem było poznanie, jak respondentki definiują cechy grzeczności i uprzejmości. Wyniki pokazują, że dominującymi atrybutami osoby grzecznej w oczach badanych są: gotowość do pomocy i bezwarunkowy szacunek, a także uprzejmość i życzliwość. Cechy te stanowią sieć ściśle powiązanych ze sobą pojęć, opartych na dobroci i szczerej trosce o drugiego człowieka, z szacunkiem i życzliwością prawdopodobnie motywującymi gotowość pomocy. To ustalenie badawcze sugeruje, że pozanaukowe rozumienie grzeczności jest szersze i nie ogranicza się do użycia języka, co było przedmiotem większości badań nad pojęciem nie/grzeczności.

Słowa kluczowe:

nie/grzeczność, konceptualizacje pozanaukowe, szacunek, pomocność, życzliwość, szczerość, komunikacja niewerbalna

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Bayraktaroğlu, A., & Sifianou, M. (2001). Introduction. In A. Bayraktaroğlu & M. Sifianou (Eds.), Linguistic politeness across boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish (pp. 1–16). John Benjamins.

Bella, S., & Ogiermann, E. (2019). An intergenerational perspective on im/politeness in Greece. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(2), 163–193.

Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and language. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 18, pp. 326–330). Elsevier.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Brownlie, J., & Anderson, S. (2017). Thinking sociologically about kindness: Puncturing the blasé in the ordinary city. Sociology, 51(6), 1222–1238.

Buss, S. (1999). Appearing respectful: The moral significance of manners. Ethics, 109(4), 795–826.

Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2021). (Im)politeness and sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár, & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 315–339). Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J., O’Driscoll, J., & Hardaker, C. (2019). Notions of politeness in Britain and North America. In E. Ogiermann & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives (pp. 177–200). Cambridge University Press.

Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320–329.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome.

Fukushima, S. (2019). A metapragmatic aspect of politeness: With a special emphasis on attentiveness in Japanese. In Ogiermann & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness (pp. 226–247).

Fukushima, S. (2020). Metapragmatics of attentiveness: A study in interpersonal and cross-cultural pragmatics. Equinox.

Fukushima, S., & Sifianou, M. (2017). Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(4), 525–555.

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., & Kádár, D. (2021). Morality and socio-pragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár, and M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 385–407). Cambridge University Press.

Haugh, M. (2007). The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 295–317.

Haugh, M. (2010). Respect and deference. In M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 271–288). De Gruyter.

Haugh, M. (2019). The metapragmatics of consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English. In Ogiermann & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness (pp. 201–225).

Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2006). Measuring respect in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 881–899.

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Kasper, G. (1997). Linguistic Etiquette. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 374–385). Blackwell.

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s’. In C. Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser, Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago Linguistic Society.

Langdon, S. W. (2007). Conceptualizations of respect: Qualitative and quantitative evidence of four (five) themes. The Journal of Psychology, 141(5), 469–484.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Locher, M. A. (2006). Polite behaviour within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua, 25(3), 249–267.

Locher, M. A., & Larina, T. (2019). Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(4), 873–903.

Mackenzie, L., & Wallace, M. (2011). The communication of respect as a significant dimension of cross-cultural communication competence. Cross-cultural Communication, 7(3), 10–18.

Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (2019). (Greek) Im/politeness: Predication and evaluation practices. Selected Papers of ISTAL, 23, 284–304.

Malti, T. (2021). Kindness: A perspective from developmental psychology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(5), 629–657.

Mayseless, O., & Scharf, M. (2009). To respect and be respected as resourceful buffers against aggression in developmental contexts. Retrieved July 10, 2016, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239592238_To_respect_and_be_respected_as_resourceful_buffers_against_aggression_in_developmental_contexts

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Nasie, M. (2022). The respect pyramid: A model of respect based on lay knowledge in two cultures. Culture & Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211066819

Ogiermann, E., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (Eds.). (2019). From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

Ogiermann, E., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2019). Im/politeness between the analyst and participant perspectives: An overview of the field. In Ogiermann & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness (pp. 1–24).

Ogiermann E., & Saloustrou, V. (2020). Conceptualising im/politeness in Greece and Great Britain. Γλωσσολογία/Glossologia, 28, 1–25.

Ogiermann, E., & Suszczyńska, M. (2011). On im/politeness behind the Iron Curtain. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), Politeness across cultures (pp. 194–215). Palgrave Macmillan.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association & Oxford University Press.

Pinto, D. (2011). Are Americans insincere? Interactional style and politeness in everyday America. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 215–238.

Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective. Clarendon Press.

Sifianou, M. (2001). ‘Oh! How appropriate’: Compliments and politeness. In A. Bayraktaroğlu & M. Sifianou (Eds.), Linguistic politeness across boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish (pp. 391–430). John Benjamins.

Sifianou, M. (2017). Η έννοια της ευγένειας στα ελληνικά [The concept of politeness in Greek]. In Th. Georgakopoulos, Th. S. Pavlidou, M. Pechlivanos, A. Alexiadou, J. Androutsopoulos, A. Kalokairinos, S. Skopeteas, & K. Stathi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (pp. 45–74). Edition Romiosini/CeMoG.

Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship? Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 49–64.

Sifianou, M., & Tzanne, A. (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4), 661–687.

Simon, B. (2007). Respect, equality, and power: A social psychological perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38(3), 309–326.

Sung, K. (2004). Elder respect among young adults: A cross-cultural study of Americans and Koreans. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 215–230.

Terkourafi, M., Catedral, L., Haider, I., Karimzad, F., Melgares, J., Mostacero-Pinilla, C., Nelson, J., & Weissman, B. (2018). Uncivil Twitter: a sociopragmatic analysis. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(1), 26–57.

Travis, C. (1997). Kind, considerate, thoughtful: a semantic analysis. Lexikos 7 AFRILEX-reeks/series, 7, 130–152.

Trudgill, P. (2017). When it comes to greeting and eating, Europeans do it better. The New European, September 7–13, 53.

Trudgill, P. (2019). Epilogue: Personal encounters with politeness research. In Ogiermann & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness (pp. 328–332).

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Arnold.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Watts, R. J. (2010). Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails. In M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 43–70). De Gruyter.

Watts, R. J., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (Eds.). (1992). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. De Gruyter.

Werkhofer, K. D. (1992). Traditional and modern views: The social constitution and the power of politeness. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide, & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (pp. 155–199). De Gruyter.

Xie, C., He, Z., & Dajin, L. (2005). Politeness: Myth and truth. Studies in Language, 29(2), 431–461.

Maria Sifianou

msifian@enl.uoa.gr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-937X

Afiliacja:

Uniwersytet Narodowy im. Kapodistriasa w Atenach, Prof. emerytowany Grecja

Biogram

Maria Sifianou is Professor Emerita of the Department of English Language and Literature, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Her publications include Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece (1992, 1999), Discourse Analysis (2006) and a number of articles in edited books and international journals. She has co-edited Themes in Greek Linguistics (1994) and Linguistic Politeness Across Boundaries (2001) among others. She is a member of the editorial board of a number of journals and the co-editor-in-chief of the Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (Benjamins) and the Focus on (Im)politeness book series (Routledge). Her main research interests include im/politeness phenomena and discourse analysis.