Euphemising Ageing in Popular and Academic Publications on the Life Course: An Exploratory Study

Agnieszka Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak

doi:10.18290/rh237106.6s

Data publikacji : 2023-07-24

Tom 71 Nr 6sp (2023)

Eufemizowanie starzenia się w popularnonaukowych i naukowych publikacjach na temat przebiegu życia. Badanie rozpoznawcze

Agnieszka Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-8275

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh237106.6s

Abstrakt

Według ekspertki w dziedzinie badań nad procesem starzenia się, Margaret Morganroth Gullette (2004), społeczna ideologia starzenia się widzianego jako schyłek życia—wraz z towarzyszącym mu lękiem—dotyka ludzi na jego coraz wcześniejszych etapach. Językowym sposobem radzenia sobie z tym lękiem jest minimalizowanie negatywnego wpływu odnoszącej się do starości leksyki. Niniejszy artykuł docieka, w jaki sposób badacze zagadnienia przebiegu życia stosują eufemizmy w odniesieniu do tożsamości i innych kwestii związanych z wiekiem i starzeniem się. Dodatkowo w tle naszych dociekań stawiamy dwa pytania: (1) czy i w jaki sposób autorzy ci angażują się w budowanie odnośnych komentarzy metajęzykowych oraz (2) czy w sposób bezpośredni przyznają oni kluczową rolę językowi i dyskursowi. Wyniki badań wskazują na stosunkowo wyraźne powiązania pomiędzy świadomym używaniem form językowych na kształtowanie postaw społecznych oraz zachowań związanych ze starzeniem się. Poza osobistym wyborem eufemizmów, opisywani autorzy używali innych środków dyskursywnych w celu prowadzenia nieoceniająco dyskursu dotyczącego procesu starzenia się, a także po to, by komentować strategie dyskursywne obecne w sferze publicznej, postrzegane przez nich jako eufemistyczne. Podstawowym celem niniejszego artykułu jest eksploracja interdyscyplinarnych kontekstów metod, jakich analizowani naukowcy używają odnosząc się do procesów starzenia się.

Słowa kluczowe:

badania procesu starzenia się, proces starzenia się, eufemizm, dyskurs akademicki

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Allan, K. (2001). Natural language semantics. Blackwell.

Allan, K. (2012). X-phemism and creativity. Lexis 7. http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/340.

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.

The American heritage guide to contemporary usage and style. (2005). Houghton Mifflin.

Arrien, A. (2007). The second half of life: Opening the eight gates of wisdom. Sounds True.

Ariès, P. (1974). Western attitudes toward death: From the Middle Ages to the present. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Benczes, R., & Burridge, K. (2015). Current attitudes to ageing as reflected in the names of Australian aged care facilities names. NAMES: A Journal of Onomastics, 63(3), 127–145.

Benczes, R., Burridge, K., Allan, K., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Old age revolution in Australian English: rethinking a taboo concept. In A. Pizarro Pedraza (Ed.), Linguistic taboo revisited: Novel insights from cognitive perspectives (pp. 99–116). Mouton.

Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Lifespan Developmental Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.

Bengtson, V. L., Elder Jr, G. H., & Putney, N. M. (2005). The life course perspective on ageing. In M. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. 493¬–509). Cambridge University Press.

Biggs, S. (2003). Understanding ageing: images, attitudes and professional practice. Open University Press.

Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Journal in English Lexicology Lexis, 7, 65–92. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355

Burridge, K., & Benczes, R. (2019). Taboo as a driver of language change. In K. Allan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of taboo words and language (pp. 180–198). Oxford University Press.

Bytheway, B. (2011). Unmasking age: The significance of age for social research. Policy Press.

Bytheway, B., Keil, T., & Allat, P. (Eds.). (1989). Becoming and being old: Sociological approaches to later life. Sage Publications.

Calasanti, T. (2015). Combating ageism: How successful is successful aging? The Gerontologist, 56(6), 1093–1101.

Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1989). Telling age in later life: Identity and face implications. Text, 9, 129–151.

Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1991). Language, society, and the elderly: Discourse, identity, and ageing. Blackwell.

Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1999). Ageing, ageism and anti-ageism: Moral stance in geriatric medical discourse. In H. E. Hamilton (Ed.), Language and communication in old age: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177–208). Routledge.

Eckert, P. (1997). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 151–167). Blackwell Publishing.

Erber, J. T. (2010). Aging and older adulthood (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Franssen, T., Stijnen, M., Hamers, F., & Schneider, F. (2020). Age differences in demographic, social and health-related factors associated with loneliness across the adult life span (19–65 years): A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09208-0

Gerstenberg, A., & Voeste, A. (Eds.). (2005). Language development: The lifespan perspective. John Benjamins.

Graham-Wisener, L., Nelson, A., Byrne, A., Islam, I., Harrison, C., Geddis, J., & Berry, E. (2022). Understanding public attitudes to death talk and advance care planning in Northern Ireland using health behaviour change theory: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 906. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13319-1

Green, L. (2010). Understanding the life course: sociological and psychological perspectives. Polity Press.

Gullette, M. M. (2000). Safe at last in the middle years: The invention of the midlife progress novel. University of California Press.

Gullette, M. M. (2004). Aged by culture. University of Chicago Press.

Gullette, M. M. (2011). Agewise: Fighting the new ageism in America. University of Chicago Press.

Gullette, M. M. (2018). Against “aging”: How to talk about growing older. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(7–8), 251–270.

Guth, L. J., & Murphy, L. (1998). People first language in middle and high schools: Usability and readability. The Clearing House, 72(2), 115–117.

Halmari, H. (2011). Political correctness, euphemism, and language change: The case of “people first”. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 828–840.

Hamilton, H. E. (1999). Language and communication in old age: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.

Harris, L. A., & Dollinger, S. (2001). Participation in a course on aging: Knowledge, attitudes, and anxiety about aging in oneself and others. Educational Gerontology, 27, 657–667.

Hendricks, J. (2012). Considering life course concepts. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(2), 226–231.

Hepworth, M. (2000). Stories of ageing. Open University Press.

Johnson, J., & Slater, R. (1993). Ageing and later life. Sage Publications.

Kellehear, A. (1984). Are we a “death-denying” society? A sociological review. Social Science and Medicine, 18, 713–723.

Lamb, S. (Ed.). (2017). Successful aging as a contemporary obsession: Global perspectives. Rutgers University Press.

Langer, E. J. (2009). Counter clockwise: A proven way to think yourself younger and healthier. Hodder.

Lasher, K. P., & Faulkender, P. J. (1993). Measurement of aging anxiety: Development of the anxiety about aging scale. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 37(4), 247–259.

Loe, M. (2017). Comfortable aging: Lessons for living from eighty-five and beyond. In S. Lamb (Ed.), Successful aging as a contemporary obsession: Global perspectives (pp. 218–229). Rutgers University Press.

Martinson, M., & Berridge, C. (2015). Successful aging and its discontents: A systematic review of the social gerontology literature. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 58–69.

Mayer, K. U. (2003). The sociology of the life course and lifespan psychology: diverging or converging pathways? In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 463–482). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_23

Nikander, P. (2002). Age in action: membership work and stage of life categories in talk. Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.

Nikander, P. (2009). Doing change and continuity: Age identity and the micro-macro divide. Ageing & Society, 29(5), 863–881.

Palmore, E. (2000). Guest editorial: Ageism in gerontological language. The Gerontologist, 40(6), 645. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.6.645

Paulus, T., & Lester, J. (2016). ATLAS.ti for conversation and discourse analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), pp. 405–428.

Pickard, S. (2016). Age studies: A sociological examination of how we age and are aged through the life course. SAGE.

Pinsker, J. (2020). When does someone become “old”? It’s surprisingly hard to find a good term for people in late life. The Atlantic, January 27. https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/01/old-people-older-elderly-middle-age/605590

Pinker, S. (1994). The game of the name. The New York Times, April 5.

Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: Denying human nature in modern life. Penguin Publishing Group.

Pinker, S. (2008). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Penguin Books.

Ruddock, J. S. (2022). The second half of your life. Vermillion.

Rotas, A. (2014). Growing old competitively: photographs of Masters athletes. Alex Rotas Publishing.

Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 433–440.

Saake, I. (2008). Moderne Todessemantiken. In I. Saake & W. Vogd (Eds.), Moderne Mythen der Medizin (pp. 237–262). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Schilling, N. (2013). Sociolinguistic fieldwork. Cambridge University Press.

Segal, L. (2014). The coming of age studies. Age, Culture, Humanities, 1(1), 31–34.

Terry, A. (2020). Euphemistic dysphemisms and dysphemistic euphemisms as means to convey irony and banter. Language and Literature, 29(1), 57–75.

Trucil, D. E., Lundebjerg, N. E., & Busso, D. S. (2021). When it comes to older adults, language matters and is changing: American Geriatrics Society update on reframing aging style changes. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 69, 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16848

Woodward, K. M. (1991). Aging and its discontents: Freud and other fictions. Indiana University Press.

Ylänne, V. (Ed.). (2012). Representing ageing: images and identities. Palgrave Macmillan.

Agnieszka Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak

akiel@amu.edu.pl
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-8275

Afiliacja:

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Polska

Biogram

Agnieszka Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak is Associate Professor in the Faculty of English at Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. She has done research and lectured internationally on social dialectology, historical sociolinguistics, discourse analysis as well as language and gender issues. She has published chapters in Wiley-Blackwell handbooks. She recently co-edited (with M. Wrembel and P. Gąsiorowski) Approaches to the Study of Sound Structure and Speech (Routledge 2020). Her current research interests focus on life-span sociolinguistics, the discourse of ageing and intergenerational communication. In 2021, she co-designed and is now supervising an MA studies teaching programme Language and Communication in Healthcare.