The legislator of the 1983 Code of Canon Law sets forth the legal requirements for the validity of the substance of the Eucharist. In Can. 925 § 2, he included the disposition that the bread should be of wheat alone and recently made. In the General Instruction to the Roman Missal, however, these requirements are supplemented by an indication that the Eucharistic bread should also be unleavened (no. 320).
The purpose of this paper is to show the latter feature as essential and symbolic, but not absolutely necessary in the context of the validity of the Eucharistic substance in the Catholic Church, because in the Latin liturgy the Eucharist is celebrated with unleavened bread, while in some Eastern Catholic Churches the Divine Liturgy is celebrated with leavened bread.
The answer to the research problem posed in this way will be preceded by a linguistic analysis, in which the origin of the Polish adjective przaśny (‘unleavened’) will be explained, with references to the source Greek ἄζυμος, its derivative Latin azymus, and its French borrowing in the form of azyme (sans levain).
Cited by / Share
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Roczniki Humanistyczne · ISSN 0035-7707 | eISSN 2544-5200 | DOI: 10.18290/rh
© The Learned Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin & The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Faculty of Humanities
Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)