The Decade of Homeland (2011–2020): Critically Analyzing the (Gendered) Narrative of the War on Terror

Aleksandra Różalska

doi:10.18290/rh247211.7s

Published : 2024-06-06

Vol. 72 No. 11 Zeszyt specjalny (2024)

The Decade of Homeland (2011–2020): Critically Analyzing the (Gendered) Narrative of the War on Terror

Aleksandra Różalska

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-3573

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh247211.7s

Abstract

Drawing from the recent postcolonial and feminist scholarship and critiques of ethnocentric and orientalist narratives of the war on terror that informed popular culture within the last two decades, the text looks critically at the HBO television series Homeland (2011–2020), whose eighth and concluding season aired in early 2020. It focuses on the following aspects: the state of exception (as coined by Giorgio Agamben), the processes of surveillance and targeting the enemy, and the leading female protagonist of the series, Carrie Mathison. The text aims to investigate the changes Homeland has undergone with regards to (gendered) depictions of the war on terror and the Muslim Other as well as the show’s contributions to, impacts on, and reevaluation of the notion of national (in)security, the politics of surveillance, the failure of securitization of American life, and the (toxic) masculinity that dominated the post-9/11 political and media discourses. The conclusion is that Homeland goes beyond narrating the war on terror by turning to more recent threats and challenges for American politics and society, such as polarization of the political elite, populist and nationalist movements, fake news, and conspiracy theories that fuel media and public discourses. However, it does not condemn the overall logic of the war on terror, based on the state of exception, aggressive American foreign politics, racial profiling in the domestic fight with terrorism and torture as an effective way to deal with extremists.

Keywords:

Homeland, war on terror, state of exception, gender, enemy

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Translated by Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Alsultany, Evelyn. 2012. Arabs and Muslims in the Media. Race and Representation after 9/11. New York: New York University Press.

Baer, Josette. 2022. “‘I Am Never Done!’ – Homeland: Is Carrie Mathison a Convincing Example of Political Sustainability and Political Efficiency?” In Nachhaltigkeit und Effizienz: Erster Teil, edited by Wolfgang Rother, 57–91. Zürich: HOPE

Bevan, Alex. 2015. “The National Body, Women, and Mental Health in Homeland.” Cinema Journal 54 (4): 145–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2015.0048.

Hagelin, Sarah, and Gillian Silverman. 2022. “Homeland and the Rejection of the Domestic Plot.” In The New Female Antihero: The Disruptive Women of Twenty-First-Century US Television, 95–115. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Graham, Stephen. 2006. “Cities and ‘The War on Terror’.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 255–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00665.x.

Griffin, Jeff. 2009. “The State of Exception in Film: Cloverfield and 24.” disClosure. A Journal of Social Theory 18, Article 6, 75–104. https://doi.org/10.13023/disclosure.18.06.

Hill, Libby. 2014. “A Shocking, Horrifying Act on Homeland Aims to Build Empathy for the Indefensible.” Vox, October 6, 2014. https://www.vox.com/2014/10/6/6900651/homeland-carrie-drowns-baby.

“Homeland Uncovered.” 2012. GQ: Gentlemen’s Quarterly (September). https://www.gq-maga zine.co.uk/article/claire-danes-gq-cover-homeland.

Letort, Delphine. 2017. “Conspiracy Culture in Homeland (2011-2015).” Media, War & Conflict 10 (2): 152–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635216656968.

Loadenthal, Michael. 2019. “Othering Terrorism: A Rhetorical Strategy of Strategic Labeling.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 13 (2): 74–105. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13. 2.1704.

Meyrowitz, Josua. 2009. “We Liked to Watch: Television as Progenitor of the Surveillance Society.” Annals AAPSS, no. 625, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209339576.

Monacelli, Claudia. 2018. “A Woman Among Men the Language of Madness and Power on TV —The Case of Carrie Mathison in Homeland.” American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences 45 (1): 253–73.

Negra, Diane, and Jorie Lager Wey. 2015. “Analyzing Homeland: Introduction.” Cinema Journal 54 (4): 126–31.

Philipose, Liz. 2007. “The Politics of Pain and the Uses of Torture.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32 (4): 1048–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/513022.

Roberts, Dorothy. 2008. “Torture and the Biopolitics of Race.” University of Miami Law Review 62 (2): 229–47. https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol62/iss2/4.

Różalska, Aleksandra. 2013. “Enemies, Tortures, and ‘Frontiersman’ Heroes: Narrating the War on Terror in American Film and Television Series (The Kingdom, Rendition, and 24).” In American Experience – The Experience of America, edited by Andrzej Ceynowa and Marek Wilczyński, 307–15. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Różalska, Aleksandra. 2016a. “Muslim Cultures as the ‘Wild Zone’: Representations of Muslim Women in American Television Series after 9/11.” In American Wild Zones. Space, Experiences, Consciousness, edited by Jerzy Kamionowski and Jacek Partyka, 279–92. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Różalska, Aleksandra. 2016b. “Wojna z terroryzmem w amerykańskich serialach telewizyjnych.” In Seriale w kontekście kulturowym. Gatunki – Motywy – Mutacje, edited by Daria Bruszewska-Przytuła and Alina Naruszewicz-Duchlińska, 135–50. Olsztyn: Instytut Polonistyki i Logopedii UWM.

Steenberg, Lindsay, and Yvonne Tasker. 2015. “‘Pledge Allegiance’: Gendered Surveillance, Crime Television, and Homeland.” Cinema Journal 54 (4): 132–38.

Wondemaghen, Meron. 2019. “Homeland and Its Use of Bipolar Disorder for Sensationalist and Dramatic Effect.” Social Semiotics 29 (2): 131–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.20 17.1422900.