Eventualities in Nominalisation Semantics: The Case of Denominal -ment Formations

Sven Kotowski; Viktoria Schneider; Lea Kawaletz

doi:10.18290/rh237111-6s

Published : 2023-07-27

Vol. 71 No. 11sp (2023)

Eventualities in Nominalisation Semantics: The Case of Denominal -ment Formations

Sven Kotowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4484-8949

Viktoria Schneider

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0557-4658

Lea Kawaletz

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-2486

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh237111-6s

Abstract

Many English nominalising suffixes give rise to derivatives that usually denote either eventualities or participants of eventualities (e.g. confirm → confirmation; train → trainee). The implicit consensus in the literature is that their eventuality-related semantics derives from base structures encoding eventualities, and that pertinent suffixes prefer verbs as bases given the natural concurrence of verbs and eventualities. Unsurprisingly, then, previous studies of nominalisation semantics deal nearly exclusively with deverbal formations. However, we also find denominal nouns with the same suffixes and similar semantics (e.g. sediment → sedimentation; debt → debtee), which poses questions on how such readings arise and how they should be modelled.

In this paper, we report on eventuality-related denominal -ment formations. We employ a framesemantic approach to derivation that models nominalisation semantics as the potential to induce referential shifts on base structures. We make use of corpus attestations and show that denominal forms, just like deverbal ones, allow for referential shifts, but that the location of the eventuality within the semantic structure of the base differs depending on the base noun. We focus on two classes of nominal base nouns with different properties, namely, eventuality-denoting psych nouns and person-denoting attitudinal nouns, and formally model one representative of each class. Employing frame-based deep decomposition, we show that the input to -ment nominalisations systematically encodes eventualities, irrespective of the base’s part-of-speech, and therefore allows for extending the reference shifting approach to the denominal domain.

Keywords:

English morphology, derivational semantics, frame semantics, eventualities, nominalisations

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. John Benjamins, 2001.

Alexiadou, Artemis. “Nominalizations: A Probe into the Architecture of Grammar Part I: The Nominalization Puzzle.” Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 4, no. 7, 2010, pp. 496–511.

Anderson, Curt and Sebastian Lobner. “Roles and the Compositional Semantics of Role-Denoting¨ Relational Adjectives.” Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, vol. 22, no. 1, 2018, pp. 91–108.

Baeskow, Heike. “Noun-Verb Conversion as a Metonymic Metamorphosis.” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 18, no. 1, 2021, pp. 2–34.

Balteiro, Isabel. The Directionality of Conversion in English: A Dia-Synchronic Study. Lang, 2007.

Barker, Chris. “Episodic -ee in English: A Thematic Role Constraint on New Word Formation.” Language, vol. 74, no. 4, 1998, pp. 695–727.

Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cognitive Psychology. An Overview for Cognitive Sciences. Erlbaum, 1992.

Barsalou, Lawrence W. “Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields.” Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, edited by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Kittay, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.

Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford UP, 2013.

Bonami, Olivier, and Berthold Crysmann. “The Role of Morphology in Constraint-Based Lexicalist Grammars.” Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, edited by Andrew Hippisley and Gregory T. Stump, Cambridge UP, 2016, pp. 609–656.

Booij, Geert E. Construction Morphology. Oxford UP, 2010.

Borer, Hagit. Taking Form. Oxford UP, 2013.

Bram, Barli. Major Total Conversion in English. 2011. Victoria U, Wellington, PhD dissertation.

Davies, Mark. British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). 2004.

Davies, Mark. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). 2016–.

Davies, Mark. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 2008–.

Fábregas, Antonio, Rafael Marín, and Louise McNally. “From Psych Verbs to Nouns.” Telicity, Change, and State, edited by Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally, Oxford UP, 2012, pp. 162–84,

Grimshaw, Jane Barbara. Argument Structure. MIT Press, 1990.

Haspelmath, Martin. “Word Classes and Parts of Speech.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, Elsevier, 2001, pp. 16538–45.

Kawaletz, Lea. The Semantics of English -ment Nominalizations. 2021. Heinrich Heine Universität

Düsseldorf. PhD Dissertation.

Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates.” Language, vol. 81, no. 2, 2005, pp. 345–81.

Koenig, Jean-Pierre. Lexical Relations. CSLI Publ. Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1999.

Lakoff, George. “Stative Adjectives and Verbs in English.” Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation Report NSF-17, 1966, pp. 1–16.

Levin, Beth. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. U of Chicago P, 1993.

Lieber, Rochelle. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalization. Cambridge UP, 2016.

Lieber, Rochelle. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge UP, 2004.

Lieber, Rochelle. “Nominalization: General Overview and Theoretical Issues.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias, edited by Mark Aronoff, Oxford UP, 2017.

Löbner, Sebastian. “Frame Theory with First-Order Comparators: Modeling the Lexical Meaning of Punctual Verbs of Change with Frames”. Logic, Language, and Computation, edited by Helle Hvid Hansen, Sarah E. Murray, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Henk Zeevat, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017, pp. 98–117.

Löbner, Sebastian. Understanding Semantics. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2013. Understanding Language Series.

Maienborn, Claudia. Die Logische Form von Kopula-Satzen. De Gruyter, 2003.

Metzger, Sarah, Sebastian Bucking, Frauke Buscher, Natascha Elxnath, Johanna Herdtfelder, Julia Lukassek, Anna Prysłopska, Sarah Zobel, and Claudia Maienborn. Basisontologie zur Semantischen Annotation von Nomina – Manual. 7 Nov. 2019. U of Tübingen, 2019. Manuscript.

Moltmann, Friederike. “Natural Language and Its Ontology”. Metaphysics and Cognitive Science, edited by Alvin I. Goldman and Brian P. McLaughlin, Oxford UP, 2019, pp. 206–232,

Morzycki, Marcin. “Degree Modification of Gradable Nouns: Size Adjectives and Adnominal Degree Morphemes.” Natural Language Semantics, vol. 17, no. 2, 2009, pp. 175–203. OED. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford UP, 2021.

Paradis, Carita. “Configurations, Construals and Change: Expressions of DEGREE.” English Language and Linguistics, vol. 12, no. 2, 2008, pp. 317–43.

Pesetzky, David. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. MIT Press, 1995.

Petersen, Wiebke. “Representation of Concepts as Frames.” Complex Cognition and Qualitative Science: A Legacy of Oswald Kulpe (The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 2), edited by Jurgis Skilters, Fiorenza Toccafondi, and Gerhard Stemberger, U of Latvia, 2007, pp. 151–70.

Plag, Ingo. “Syntactic Category Information and the Semantics of Derivational Morphological Rules.” Folia Linguistica, vol. 38, no. 3–4, 2004, pp. 193–225.

Plag, Ingo. Word-Formation in English. 2nd ed., Cambridge UP, 2018.

Plag, Ingo, Marios Andreou, and Lea Kawaletz. “A Frame-Semantic Approach to Polysemy in Affixation”. The Lexeme in Descriptive and Theoretical Morphology, edited by Olivier Bonami, Gilles Boye, Georgette Dal, Hélène Giraudo, and Fiammetta Namer, Language Science Press, 2018, pp. 467–86.

Pollard, Carl Jesse, and Ivan A. Sag. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1994.

Princeton University. “About WordNet.” wordnet.princeton.edu. 2010.

Pustejovsky, James. The Generative Lexicon. 2nd ed., MIT Press, 1996.

Riehemann, Susanne Z. “Type-Based Derivational Morphology.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, vol. 2, no. 1, 1998, pp. 49–77.

Sag, Ivan A. “Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis.” Sign-Based Construction Grammar, edited by Hans Christian Boas and Ivan A. Sag, CSLI Publ. Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2012, pp. 69–202.

Sag, Ivan A., and Thomas Wasow. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1999.

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. “Towards a Functional-Cognitive Lexicology of Nouns.” Words, Lexemes, Concepts – Approaches to the Lexicon, edited by Wolfgang Falkner and Hans-Jörg Schmid, Gunter Narr Verlag/Narr, 1999, pp. 213–26.

Schulzek, Daniel. A Frame Approach to German Nominal Word Formation. 2019. Heinrich-Heine-Universität

Düsseldorf. PhD Dissertation.

Schulzek, Daniel. “A Frame Approach to Metonymical Processes in Some Common Types of German Word Formation.” Frames and Concept Types, edited by Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald, and Wiebke Petersen, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 221–42.

Solt, Stephanie. “Measurement Scales in Natural Language.” Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015, pp. 14–32.

Szabo, Zoltán Gendler. “Major Parts of Speech”. Erkenntnis, vol. 80, no. 1, 2015, pp. 3–29.

Temme, Anne. The Peculiar Nature of Psych Verbs and Experiencer Object Structures. 2018. Humboldt-Universität Berlin. PhD Dissertation.

Van Valin, Robert D. and Randy J. LaPolla. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge UP, 1997.

Vendler, Zeno. Linguistics in Philosophy. Cornell UP, 1967.

Zobel, Sarah. “The Sensitivity of Natural Language to the Distinction Between Class Nouns and Role Nouns.” Proceedings of SALT, vol. 27, 2018, pp. 438–58.