Analysis of Potential Educational Areas of Pokémon Go! Game Use Based on Mini FGI Method

Magdalena Butkiewicz; Mateusz Kot

doi:10.18290/rns2023.0027

Data publikacji : 2023-09-01

Tom 51 Nr 3 (2023)

Analiza obszarów potencjalnego wykorzystania edukacyjnego „Pokemon Go!” Na podstawie mini FGI

Magdalena Butkiewicz

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-6060

Mateusz Kot

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-8420

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2023.0027

Abstrakt

W niniejszym tekście skupiono się na próbie określenia edukacyjnego charakteru aplikacji „Pokemon Go!” na podstawie interakcji użytkowników z elementami przestrzeni wirtualnej i rzeczywistej. W tym celu zdecydowano się na przeprowadzenie wywiadów z graczami w minigrupach fokusowych (mini FGI). Zapytano ich o interakcję z rzeczywistymi obiektami odzwierciedlonymi w grze, samodzielne poszukiwanie informacji o odwiedzanych lokalizacjach oraz tworzenie treści edukacyjnych w przestrzeni gry. Graczy zapytano także o ich pomysły na zwiększenie możliwości edukacyjnych „Pokemon Go!”, ponieważ uznano, że warto wykazać opinię użytkowników praktycznie wykorzystujących grę.

Na podstawie pozyskanych wyników – po pierwsze – wskazano obszary mogące posiadać potencjał edukacyjny, ale wymagające poprawy, a po drugie – sformułowano propozycje mające na celu zwiększenie możliwości edukacyjnych gry.

Słowa kluczowe:

edukacja, gry mobilne, mini FGI, edukacja medialna, Pokemon Go

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Alavesa P., & Xu Y. (2022), Unblurring the boundary between daily life and gameplay in location-based mobile games, visual online ethnography on Pokémon GO, Behaviour & Information Technology, no. 41(1), p. 215-227; doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1825810.

Althoff T., White R.W., & Horvitz E. (2016), Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications, Journal of Medical Internet Research, no. 18(12), e 315; doi: 10.2196/jmir.6759.

Ariza A.R., Serrano S.L., Manzano S.S., & López E.J.M. (2018), Videojuegos activos y cognición. Propuestas educativas en adolescentes, RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, no. 21(2), p. 285-303; doi: 10.5944/ried.21.2.19799.

Bruno L.E. (2019), Get Gamified: Promoting Augmented Reality and Digital Game Technology in Education, [in:] V. Geroimenko (ed.), Augmented Reality Games I: Understanding the Pokémon GO Phenomenon, Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 237-251; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_15.

Cacchione A. (2019), Pokémon GO Between Incidental Learning and Frame Analysis: It’s the End of the World as We Know It, [in:] V. Geroimenko (ed.), Augmented Reality Games I: Understanding the Pokémon GO Phenomenon, Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 203-215; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_13.

Colley A., Thebault-Spieker J., Lin A.Y., Degraen D., Fischman B., Häkkilä J., and Wenig N. (2017), The geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement, [in:] Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1179-1192; doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025495.

Comunello F., Mulargia S. (2017), My Grandpa and I “Gotta Catch ‘Em All.” A Research Design on Intergenerational Gaming Focusing on Pokémon Go, [in:] J. Zhou, G. Salvendy (eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts. ITAP 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10298; doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_19.

Deslis D., Kosmidis CV., and Tenta E. (2019), Using a Non-educational Mobile Game for Learning in Biology, Geography and Mathematics: Pokémon Go as a Case Study, [in:] M. Tsitouridou, A.J. Diniz, and T.A. Mikropoulos (eds.), Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education, TECH-EDU 2018 (Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 993), Cham: Springer; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_29.

Gill P., Stewart K., Treasure E., & Chadwick B. (2008), Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups, British Dental Journal, 204(6), p. 291-295; doi: 10.1038/ bdj.2008.192.

Graells-Garrido E., Ferres L., Caro D., & Bravo L. (2017), The effect of Pokémon Go on the pulse of the city: a natural experiment, EPJ Data Science, 6, no. 23, p. 1-19; doi: 10.1140/epjds/ s13688-017-0119-3.

Harborth D., & Pape S. (2020), How nostalgic feelings impact Pokémon Go players – integrating childhood brand nostalgia into the technology acceptance theory, Behaviour & Information Technology, no. 39(12), p. 1276-1296; doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1662486.

Joseph B., & Armstrong D.G. (2016), Potential perils of peri-Pokémon perambulation: The dark reality of augmented reality?, Oxford Medical Case Reports, 2016(10), omw080.

Kamboj A.K., & Krishna S.G. (2017), Pokémon GO: An innovative smartphone gaming application with health benefits, Primary Care Diabetes, 11(4), p. 397-399; doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.03.008.

Kot M. (2021a), Educational Value of Mobile Games Using Augmented Reality in Urban space – Participatory Observation of the “Pokemon Go!”, Media Education, no. 17(1), p. 86-92; doi: 10.13187/me.2021.1.86.

Kot M. (2021b), Edukacja medialna a emocje związane z budowaniem długotrwałego potencjału komercyjnego treści na przykładzie produktów związanych z uniwersum Pokemon, [in:] M. Butkiewicz and G. Łęcicki (eds.), Emocje w Filmie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, p. 189-202.

Laato S., Pietarinen T., Rauti S., & Laine T.H. (2019), Analysis of the Quality of Points of Interest in the Most Popular Location-based Games, [in:] Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 153-160; doi: 10.1145/3345252.3345286.

Laine T.H. (2018), Mobile Educational Augmented Reality Games: A Systematic Literature Review and Two Case Studies, Computers, no. 7(1), e19; doi: 10.3390/computers7010019.

Lee J., Lee H.-K., Jeong D., Lee J., Kim T., & Lee J. (2021), Developing Museum Education Content: AR Blended Learning, International Journal of Art & Design Education, p. 473-491; doi: 10.1111/jade.12352.

Lin P.-C., Lu H.-K., Lin Y.-H., & Tsang W.-H. (2017), A Study of a Mobile Game on the Interrelationships of Technology Acceptance, Interpersonal Relation, Sense of Direction, and Information Literacy – A Case of Pokémon GO, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, no. 7(12), p. 942-947; doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.12.1000.

Lisek-Michalska J. (2013), Badania fokusowe. Problemy metodologiczne i etyczne, Łodź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Łobocki M. (2009), Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych, Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza “Impuls”.

Malik A., Hiekkanen K., Hussain Z., Hamari J., & Johri A. (2020), How players across gender and age experience Pokémon Go?, Universal Access in the Information Society, no. 19(4), p. 799-812; doi: 10.1007/s10209-019-00694-7.

Morgan D.L. (1999), The focus group guidebook, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Mozelius P., Jaldemark J., & Hellerstedt A. (2020), Aristotle, Comenius, Dewey, Plato and Pokémon GO: Walking with Location-based Games in the Footsteps of Didactic Giants, [in:] Fifteenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Heidelberg, Germany: CEUR-WS.

O’Connor H., & Madge C. (2003), “Focus groups in cyberspace”: Using the Internet for qualitative research, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, no. 6(2), p. 133-143; doi: 10.1108/13522750310470190.

Oliveira P.R.B. (2017), Pokémon GO: Discutindo Dispositivos e a pedagogia dos jogos eletrônicos, Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, no. 10(2), p. 50-65; doi: 10.17851/1983-3652.10.2.50-65.

Paasovaara S., Jarusriboonchai P., & Olsson T. (2017), Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players, [in:] Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 151-163; doi: 10.1145/3152832.3152854.

Paavilainen J., Korhonen H., Alha K., Stenros J., Koskinen E., & Mayra F. (2017), The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream, [in:] Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 2493-2498; doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025871.

Pombo L., & Marques M. (2020), The Potential Educational Value of Mobile Augmented Reality Games: The Case of EduPARK App., Education Sciences, no. 10, p. 1-20; doi: 10.3390/educsci10100287.

Ponte C., & Aroldi P. (2013), Connecting generations. A research and learning approach for media education and audience studies, Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, no. 21(41), p. 167-176; doi: 10.3916/C41-2013-16.

Rauschnabel P.A., Rossmann A., & tom Dieck M.C. (2017), An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go, Computers in Human Behavior, no. 76, p. 276-286; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030.

Remmer M., Denami M., & Marquet P. (2017), Why Pokémon GO is the future of school education. Effects of AR on intrinsic motivation of children at elementary school, [in:] Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference – Laval Virtual 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1-5.

Shea R., Fu D., Sun A., Cai C., Ma X., Fan X., Gong W., and Liu J. (2017), Location-Based Augmented Reality With Pervasive Smartphone Sensors: Inside and Beyond Pokemon Go!, IEEE Access, no. 5, p. 9619-9631; doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2696953.

Silvia H., & Carr N.K. (2020), When Worlds Collide: Protecting Physical World Interests Against Virtual World Malfeasance, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, no. 26, p. 279-315.

Szlachta Junior A.M., & Ramos M.E.T. (2019), Possibilidades para a educação patrimonial por meio de games de realidade aumentada, Métis História e Cultura, no. 18(35), p. 97-120; doi: 10.18226/22362762.v18.n.35.05.

Thelwall M., & Nevill T. (2021), Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies, Library & Information Science Research, no. 43(2); doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094.

Thongmak M. (2020), Determinants of intention to play Pokémon Go, Heliyon, no. 6(12); doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03895.

Tran K.M. (2018a), Families, resources, and learning around Pokémon Go, E-Learning and Digital Media, no. 15(3), p. 113-127; doi: 10.1177/2042753018761166.

Tran K.M. (2018b), Distributed Teaching and Learning in Pokémon Go (dissertation, Arizona State University), Arizona State University. Retrieved from https://keep.lib.asu.edu/_flysystem/ fedora/c7/194824/Tran_asu_0010E_17749.pdf.

Vella K., Johnson D., Cheng V.W.S., Davenport T., Mitchell J., Klarkowski M., & Phillips C. (2019), A Sense of Belonging: Pokémon GO and Social Connectedness, Games and Culture, 14(6), p. 583-603; doi: 10.1177/1555412017719973.

Wang A.I., & Skjervold A. (2021), Health and social impacts of playing Pokémon Go on various player groups, Entertainment Computing, no. 39; doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100443.

Wimmer R.D., & Dominick J.R. (2008), Mass media: Metody badań, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Wong F.Y. (2017), Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: A cross-sectional study, International Journal of Health Geographics, no. 16(1), p. 1-12; doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0080-1.

Woods O. (2021), Experiencing the unfamiliar through mobile gameplay: Pokémon go as augmented tourism, Area, no. 53(1), p. 183-190; doi: 10.1111/area.12633.

Wu M.-H. (2019), The applications and effects of learning English through augmented reality: A case study of Pokémon Go, Computer Assisted Language Learning, p. 1-35; doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1642211.

Yan Z., Finn K., & Breton K. (2020), Does it Promote Physical Activity? College Students’ Perceptions of Pokémon Go, Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, no. 9(1), p. 5-10; doi: 10.26773/mjssm.200301.

Zhang Y., & Zhang J. (2018), Could Nearby Pokéstops Improve Restaurants’ Online Reputation?, [in:] Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. AIS Electronic Library.

Zhao B., & Zhang S. (2019), Rethinking Spatial Data Quality: Pokémon Go as a Case Study of Location Spoofing, The Professional Geographer, no. 71(1), p. 96-108; doi: 10.1080/00330124.2018.1479973.

Zsila Á., Orosz G., Bőthe B., Tóth-Király I., Király O., Griffiths M., & Demetrovics Z. (2018), An empirical study on the motivations underlying augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go during and after Pokémon fever, Personality and Individual Differences, no. 133, p. 56-66; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.024.