The Teaching About De Facto States in Times of Crises: The Case of Transnistria

Marcin Kosienkowski

doi:10.18290/rns2024.0042

Data publikacji : 2024-12-09

Tom 52 Nr 4 (2024)

Nauczanie o państwach de facto w czasach kryzysu na przykładzie Naddniestrza

Marcin Kosienkowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-7371

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2024.0042

Abstrakt

W niniejszym artykule dzielę się swoimi doświadczeniami z nauczania o jednym z państw de facto, Naddniestrzu, w czasach kryzysu oraz w środowisku środkowo- i wschodnioeuropejskim i wielokulturowym. Rozpoczynam od wyjaśnienia, gdzie i kiedy uczę o Naddniestrzu, co może nie być oczywiste, ponieważ jest to wąski temat. Następnie koncentruję się na tym, jak podchodzę do nauczania o Naddniestrzu jako kwestii kontrowersyjnej i drażliwej, która wymaga specyficznego podejścia dydaktycznego. Na koniec omawiam wyniki zastosowania tego podejścia i dzielę się swoimi odczuciami związanymi z nauczaniem o Naddniestrzu. Artykuł ten może być wartościowy dla młodszych nauczycieli akademickich, którzy niedawno rozpoczęli nauczanie o Naddniestrzu i innych de facto państwach i potrzebują wskazówek. Może również zainteresować doświadczonych nauczycieli, oferując im możliwość porównania swoich strategii nauczania.

Słowa kluczowe:

Naddniestrze, państwa de facto, dydaktyka, tematy kontrowersyjne, tematy drażliwe

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Axyonova V. and Lozka K. (2023), ‘We Are at War’: Reflections on Positionality and Research as Negotiation in Post-2022 Ukraine, Journal of International Relations and Development, no.4, pp. 711–721, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00297-z.

Blakkisrud H. and Kolstø P. (2011), From Secessionist Conflict Toward a Functioning State: Processes of State- and Nation-Building in Transnistria, Post-Soviet Affairs, no. 2, pp. 178–210, https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.2.178.

Caspersen N. (2012), Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, Cambridge: Polity.

Chaban N. and Headley J. (2023), Responsibility Not to Be Silent: Academic Knowledge Production About the War Against Ukraine and Knowledge Diplomacy, Journal of International Relations and Development, no. 4, pp. 733–747, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00300-7.

Colbey R. (2022), The Status and Recognition of Post-1992 Transnistria: An Investigation of the Case for de jure Independence, London: The University of Buckingham Press.

De Facto States Research Unit (DFSRU) (2023a), Dynamics of Frozen Conflicts under Scrutiny: Producing and Delivering Knowledge (Program of a Pre-conference Workshop), 11 June, Tartu: The University of Tartu.

De Facto States Research Unit at (DFSRU) (2023b), Newsroom: A Pre-conference Workshop, 11 June, Tartu: The University of Tartu, https://www.defactostates.ut.ee/newsroom/ [accessed: 9.05.2024].

De Facto States Research Unit (DFSRU) (2024), About Us, 9 May, Tartu: The University of Tartu, https://www.defactostates.ut.ee/?lang=et [accessed: 9.05.2024].

Devyatkov A. and Kosienkowski M. (2013), Testing Pluralism: Transnistria in the Light of 2011 Presidential Elections, [in:] M. Kosienkowski (ed.), Spotkania polsko-mołdawskie: Księga poświęcona pamięci Profesora Janusza Solaka [Polish-Moldovan Encounters: The Commemorative Book for Professor Janusz Solak], Lublin: Episteme, pp. 303–328.

Foster S.D. (2024), “Pridnestrovie for Peace”: Accounting for Transnistrian Divergence From the Russian Position vis-à-vis the Russo-Ukrainian War, Peace Review, no. 1 (special issue), pp. 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2311691.

Geldenhuys D. (2009), Contested States in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Goldberg T., Wagner W. and Petrović N. (2019), From Sensitive Historical Issues to History Teachers’ Sensibility: A Look Across and Within Countries, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, no. 1, pp. 7–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1566165.

Hoch T. and Kopeček V. (eds.) (2020), De Facto States in Eurasia, Abingdon: Routledge.

Ibañez-Etxeberria A., Albas L., Gaskue S. and Vicent N. (2022), Education and Controversial Topics in Post-conflict Societies: The Coexistence and Memory Project in Contemporary Teacher Training in the Basque Country, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 81–98.

Jerome L. and Elwick A. (2020), Teaching About Terrorism, Extremism and Radicalisation: Some Implications for Controversial Issues Pedagogy, Oxford Review of Education, no. 2, pp. 222–237, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1667318.

Johnson H.A. (1990), Humor as an Innovative Method for Teaching Sensitive Topics, Educational Gerontology, no. 6, pp. 547–559, https://doi.org/10.1080/0380127900160605.

Kello K. (2016), Sensitive and Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Teaching History in a Divided Society, Teachers and Teaching, no. 1, pp. 35–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027.

Ker-Lindsay J. (2022), De Facto States in the 21st Century, [in:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, pp. 1–13, 28 January, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.635.

Komarnitskiy G. (2006), Mina zamedlennogo deystviya [Мина замедленного действия/A Time Bomb], Tiraspol: Poligrafist.

Kosienkowski M. (2009), Ukraina wobec Naddniestrza [Ukraine towards Transnistria], Lublin: Instytut Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej.

Kosienkowski M. (2010), Naddniestrzańska Republika Mołdawska: Determinanty przetrwania [The Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic: Survival Determinants], Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Kosienkowski M. (2012), Continuity and Change in Transnistria’s Foreign Policy after the 2011 Presidential Elections, Lublin: The Catholic University of Lublin Publishing House.

Kosienkowski M. (2013), Is Internationally Recognised Independence the Goal of Quasi-States? The Case of Transnistria, [in:] N. Cwicinskaja and P. Oleksy (eds.), Moldova: In Search of Its Own Place in Europe, Bydgoszcz: Epigram, pp. 55–65.

Kosienkowski M. (2014a), Naddniestrze a bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy [Transnistria and Ukraine’s Security], Securitologia, no. 1, pp. 93–104.

Kosienkowski M. (2014b), Ukraine and Transnistria, New Eastern Europe, 29 September, https://www.neweasterneurope.eu/2014/09/29/ukraine-transnistria-troubled-borderland/ [accessed: 9.05.2024].

Kosienkowski M. (2018), Współpraca społeczności międzynarodowej z państwami de facto: Studium przypadków [International Community’s Engagement with De Facto States: The Study of Cases], Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Kosienkowski M. (2020), The Patron-Client Relationship Between Russia and Transnistria, [in:] T. Hoch and V. Kopeček (eds.), De Facto States in Eurasia, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 183–207.

Kosienkowski M. (2022), The 2006 Sovereignty Referendum in Transnistria: A Device for Electoral Advantage, Ethnopolitics, no. 5, pp. 496–516, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2021.1953317.

Kosienkowski M. (2023), Four Problems of De Facto State Studies: A Central European Perspective, Polish Political Science Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 41–53, https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202244.

Kosienkowski M. and Dembińska M. (2024), Russia’s Patronage Over Post-Soviet De Facto States: Protecting Compatriots or Geopolitical Interest in Transnistria?, Geopolitics, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2329948.

Kosienkowski M., Schreiber W. and Hahn J. (2015), Social Media in the Service of Territorial Reintegration in the post-Soviet Area, [in:] W. Schreiber and M. Kosienkowski (eds.), Digital Eastern Europe, Wrocław: The Jan Nowak Jezioranski College of Eastern Europe.

Kosienkowski M. and Ženková Rudincová K. (2024), Client De Facto States and Quasi-Patrons: Insights From the Relationship Between Somaliland and Ethiopia, Ethnopolitics, no. 2, pp. 152–172, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2121470.

Kursani S. (2021), Reconsidering the Contested State in Post-1945 International Relations: An Ontological Approach, International Studies Review, no. 3, pp. 752–778, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa073.

Lowe P. (2015), Lessening Sensitivity: Student Experiences of Teaching and Learning Sensitive Issues, Teaching in Higher Education, no. 1, pp. 119–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957272.

Miralles P. and Ibagón N.J. (2022), Historical Thinking and Controversial Issues in Social Studies Education, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 65–80.

Niens U., O’Connor U. and Smith A. (2013), Citizenship Education in Divided Societies: Teachers’ Perspectives in Northern Ireland, Citizenship Studies, no. 1, pp. 128–141, https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.716214.

Ortega-Sánchez D. (ed.) (2022a), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer.

Ortega-Sánchez D. (2022b), Teaching Controversial Issues and Social Problems from an Integrated Perspective, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 1–8.

Ó Beacháin D., Comai G. and Tsurtsumia-Zurabashvili A. (2016), The Secret Lives of Unrecognised States: Internal Dynamics, External Relations, and Counter-Recognition Strategies, Small Wars & Insurgencies, no. 3, pp. 440–466, https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1151654.

Pegg S. (1998), International Society and the De Facto State, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Pegg S. (2017), Twenty Years of de Facto State Studies, [in:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, pp. 1–30, 27 July, https:// www.oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-516 [accessed: 10.04.2022].

Quaynor L.J. (2012), Citizenship Education in Post-conflict Contexts: A Review of the Literature, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, no. 1, pp. 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197911432593.

Sætra E. (2021), Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Elements of Good Practice, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, no. 2, pp. 345–357, https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1705897.

Socor V. (2019), Transnistrian Voting Raid: A Bad Precedent for Moldova and Other Conflict Theaters, Eurasia Daily Monitor, no. 33, https://jamestown.org/program/transnistrian-voting-raid-a-bad-precedent-for-moldova-and-other-conflict-theaters/ [accessed: 29.10.2024].

Stitzlein S.M. (2022), Divisive Concepts in Classrooms: A Call to Inquiry, Studies in Philosophy and Education, no. 6, pp. 595–612, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09842-8.

Stradling R. (1984), The Teaching of Controversial Issues: An Evaluation, Educational Review, no. 2, pp. 121–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191840360202.

Zembylas M. and Bekerman Z. (2012), Teachers’ Views about Forgiveness in Israel and Cyprus: Mapping the Prospects of Forgiveness as an Educational Goal, Educational Review, no. 1, pp. 99–114, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.578733.