Proces konstytuowania się świata społecznego nauczycieli szkół międzynarodowych – dylematy i wyzwania

Gabriela Dobińska; Małgorzata Kosiorek; Joanna Leek; Marcin Rojek; Elżbieta Szulewicz

doi:10.18290/rns2024.0014

Published : 2024-05-15

Vol. 52 No. 2 (2024)

The Process of Establishing the Social World of International School Teachers – Dilemmas and Challenges

Gabriela Dobińska

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-5210

Małgorzata Kosiorek

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8093-6279

Joanna Leek

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-4454

Marcin Rojek

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-9233

Elżbieta Szulewicz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2024.0014

Abstract

The article is devoted to the process of segmentation, leading to internal differentiation and the emergence of subworlds within social worlds. The theoretical framework for the following considerations is Anselm Strauss’s sociological concept of social worlds. The subject of our analyzes was the process of establishing the social world of international school teachers in the context of challenges and dilemmas. The aim of the research was to reconstruct the mechanisms enabling the emergence of the described social world, as well as to describe the difficulties experienced by the respondents. Using the potential of grounded theory methodology and adopting an interactive perspective, dimensions were identified within which the respondents experience professional difficulties and dilemmas. It turns out that the felt tension mobilizes teachers to take specific actions to cope with everyday challenges, and this stimulates the emergence of a subworld. In the following considerations, we will characterize three types of teachers’ relationships: with students; colleagues and the environment (representatives of other social worlds).

Keywords:

social world, segmentation, symbolic interactionism, teachers

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bendkowski J. (2014), Wspólnota wiedzy, wspólnota działań oraz sieć wiedzy w perspektywie zarządzania wiedzą, Zeszyty naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, nr 76, s. 23-38.

Blumer H. (2009), Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bucher R. i Strauss A. (1961), Professions in Process, American Journal of Sociology, 66, s. 325-334.

Doherty C. i Shield P. (2012), Teachers’ Work in Curricular Markets: Conditions of Design and Relations Between the International Baccalaureate Diploma and the Local Curriculum, Curriculum Inquiry 42, nr 3, s. 414-441. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00596.x

Edwards D. i Underwood C. (2012), IB graduates in Australian Universities: Entry and outcomes. A case study of two institutions, Australian Council for Educational Research.

Glaser B.G. (1978), Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser B.G. i Strauss A.L. (2009), Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej, Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.

Hałas E. (2006), Interakcjonizm symboliczny, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kacperczyk A. (2016), Społeczne światy. Teoria – empiria – metody badań na przykładzie świata wspinaczki, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Kling R. i Gerson E.M. (1978), Patterns of segmentations and interaction in the computing world, Symbolic Interaction 1, nr 2, s. 24-43.

Konecki K. (2000), Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Lave J. i Wenger E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maire Q. (2021), Credential market: Mass schooling, academic power and the International Baccalaureate Diploma, Cham: Springer.

Outhwaite D. i Ferri G. (2017), Critical reflections on modern elite formation and social differentiation in the International Baccalaureate Diploma programme in England, Oxford Review of Education 43, nr 4, s. 402-416.

Resnik J. (2014), Who gets the best teachers? The incorporation of the IB programme into public high schools and its impact on the teacher labour market in Ecuador, [w:] R. Arber, J. Blackmore, A. Vongalis-Macrow (red.), Mobile teachers, teacher identity and international schooling, Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei: Sense Publishers, s. 95-119. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-899-2_7

Rojek M., Leek J., Kosiorek M. i Dobińska G. (2023), Mutual Learning Community: Teachers’ Opinions on Their Learning Possibilities in Schools Implementing International Programmes, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia 36, nr 1, s. 27-43. https://www.doi.org/10.17951/j.2023.36.1.27-43

Strauss A.L. (1987), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss A.L. i Corbin J.M. (red.) (1997), Grounded theory in practice, Sage Publications, Inc.

Strauss A. (1984), Social Worlds and Their Segmentation Processes, [w:] N. Denzin (ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Greenwich: JAI Press, s. 123-139.

Strauss A. (1993), Continual Permutation of Action, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Szczepanik R. (2015), Partnerki życiowe recydywistów i ich rola w powstrzymywaniu aktywności przestępczej, Profilaktyka Społeczna i Resocjalizacja 26, s. 35-57.

Śliwa M. (2016). Model konwersji wiedzy ukrytej w wiedzę jawną przy zastosowaniu algorytmu Bayes’a na przykładzie działu badawczo-rozwojowego w przedsiębiorstwie produkcyjnym, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektroniki i Informatyki Politechniki Koszalińskiej, nr 10, s. 131-145.

Tarc P. (2009), Global dreams, enduring tensions: International Baccalaureate in a changing world, New York: Peter Lang.

Theokas C. (2013), Finding America’s missing AP and IB students. The Education Trust. https://edtrust.org/resource/finding-americas-missing-ap-and-ib-students/ [dostęp: 10.09.2023].

Wright E. i Lee M. (2020), Does the international Baccalaureate ‘work’ as an alternative to mainstream schooling? Perceptions of university students in Hong Kong, Studies in Higher Education 47, nr 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1793929

Zmyślony I. (2012), Kategoria wiedzy niejawnej (tacit knowledge): typowe sposoby rozumienia, Filozofia Nauki 20, nr 3, s. 65-82.