The Teaching About De Facto States in Times of Crises: The Case of Transnistria

Marcin Kosienkowski

doi:10.18290/rns2024.0042

Published : 2024-12-09

No. Online First

The Teaching About De Facto States in Times of Crises: The Case of Transnistria

Marcin Kosienkowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-7371

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2024.0042

Abstract

In this article, I share my personal experience of teaching about the de facto state of Transnistria during times of crises and within Central and East European and multicultural contexts. I begin by explaining where and when I teach about Transnistria, which may not be so obvious because it is a narrow topic. Next, I focus on how I approach classes devoted to Transnistria as a controversial and sensitive issue that requires specific teaching strategies. Finally, I discuss the outcomes of implementing these strategies and share my personal feelings about instruction concerning Transnistria. This article may be valuable to junior scholars who have recently started covering the subject of Transnistria and other de facto states and are seeking guidance. It may also benefit experienced senior scholars by offering them an opportunity to compare their teaching strategies.

Keywords:

Transnistria, de facto states, teaching, controversial issues, sensitive issues

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Axyonova V. and Lozka K. (2023), ‘We Are at War’: Reflections on Positionality and Research as Negotiation in Post-2022 Ukraine, Journal of International Relations and Development, no.4, pp. 711–721, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00297-z.

Blakkisrud H. and Kolstø P. (2011), From Secessionist Conflict Toward a Functioning State: Processes of State- and Nation-Building in Transnistria, Post-Soviet Affairs, no. 2, pp. 178–210, https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.2.178.

Caspersen N. (2012), Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, Cambridge: Polity.

Chaban N. and Headley J. (2023), Responsibility Not to Be Silent: Academic Knowledge Production About the War Against Ukraine and Knowledge Diplomacy, Journal of International Relations and Development, no. 4, pp. 733–747, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00300-7.

Colbey R. (2022), The Status and Recognition of Post-1992 Transnistria: An Investigation of the Case for de jure Independence, London: The University of Buckingham Press.

De Facto States Research Unit (DFSRU) (2023a), Dynamics of Frozen Conflicts under Scrutiny: Producing and Delivering Knowledge (Program of a Pre-conference Workshop), 11 June, Tartu: The University of Tartu.

De Facto States Research Unit at (DFSRU) (2023b), Newsroom: A Pre-conference Workshop, 11 June, Tartu: The University of Tartu, https://www.defactostates.ut.ee/newsroom/ [accessed: 9.05.2024].

De Facto States Research Unit (DFSRU) (2024), About Us, 9 May, Tartu: The University of Tartu, https://www.defactostates.ut.ee/?lang=et [accessed: 9.05.2024].

Devyatkov A. and Kosienkowski M. (2013), Testing Pluralism: Transnistria in the Light of 2011 Presidential Elections, [in:] M. Kosienkowski (ed.), Spotkania polsko-mołdawskie: Księga poświęcona pamięci Profesora Janusza Solaka [Polish-Moldovan Encounters: The Commemorative Book for Professor Janusz Solak], Lublin: Episteme, pp. 303–328.

Foster S.D. (2024), “Pridnestrovie for Peace”: Accounting for Transnistrian Divergence From the Russian Position vis-à-vis the Russo-Ukrainian War, Peace Review, no. 1 (special issue), pp. 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2311691.

Geldenhuys D. (2009), Contested States in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Goldberg T., Wagner W. and Petrović N. (2019), From Sensitive Historical Issues to History Teachers’ Sensibility: A Look Across and Within Countries, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, no. 1, pp. 7–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1566165.

Hoch T. and Kopeček V. (eds.) (2020), De Facto States in Eurasia, Abingdon: Routledge.

Ibañez-Etxeberria A., Albas L., Gaskue S. and Vicent N. (2022), Education and Controversial Topics in Post-conflict Societies: The Coexistence and Memory Project in Contemporary Teacher Training in the Basque Country, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 81–98.

Jerome L. and Elwick A. (2020), Teaching About Terrorism, Extremism and Radicalisation: Some Implications for Controversial Issues Pedagogy, Oxford Review of Education, no. 2, pp. 222–237, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1667318.

Johnson H.A. (1990), Humor as an Innovative Method for Teaching Sensitive Topics, Educational Gerontology, no. 6, pp. 547–559, https://doi.org/10.1080/0380127900160605.

Kello K. (2016), Sensitive and Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Teaching History in a Divided Society, Teachers and Teaching, no. 1, pp. 35–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027.

Ker-Lindsay J. (2022), De Facto States in the 21st Century, [in:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, pp. 1–13, 28 January, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.635.

Komarnitskiy G. (2006), Mina zamedlennogo deystviya [Мина замедленного действия/A Time Bomb], Tiraspol: Poligrafist.

Kosienkowski M. (2009), Ukraina wobec Naddniestrza [Ukraine towards Transnistria], Lublin: Instytut Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej.

Kosienkowski M. (2010), Naddniestrzańska Republika Mołdawska: Determinanty przetrwania [The Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic: Survival Determinants], Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Kosienkowski M. (2012), Continuity and Change in Transnistria’s Foreign Policy after the 2011 Presidential Elections, Lublin: The Catholic University of Lublin Publishing House.

Kosienkowski M. (2013), Is Internationally Recognised Independence the Goal of Quasi-States? The Case of Transnistria, [in:] N. Cwicinskaja and P. Oleksy (eds.), Moldova: In Search of Its Own Place in Europe, Bydgoszcz: Epigram, pp. 55–65.

Kosienkowski M. (2014a), Naddniestrze a bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy [Transnistria and Ukraine’s Security], Securitologia, no. 1, pp. 93–104.

Kosienkowski M. (2014b), Ukraine and Transnistria, New Eastern Europe, 29 September, https:// www.neweasterneurope.eu/2014/09/29/ukraine-transnistria-troubled-borderland/ [accessed: 9.05.2024].

Kosienkowski M. (2018), Współpraca społeczności międzynarodowej z państwami de facto: Studium przypadków [International Community’s Engagement with De Facto States: The Study of Cases], Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Kosienkowski M. (2020), The Patron-Client Relationship Between Russia and Transnistria, [in:] T. Hoch and V. Kopeček (eds.), De Facto States in Eurasia, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 183–207.

Kosienkowski M. (2022), The 2006 Sovereignty Referendum in Transnistria: A Device for Electoral Advantage, Ethnopolitics, no. 5, pp. 496–516, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2021.1953317.

Kosienkowski M. (2023), Four Problems of De Facto State Studies: A Central European Perspective, Polish Political Science Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 41–53, https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202244.

Kosienkowski M. and Dembińska M. (2024), Russia’s Patronage Over Post-Soviet De Facto States: Protecting Compatriots or Geopolitical Interest in Transnistria?, Geopolitics, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2329948.

Kosienkowski M., Schreiber W. and Hahn J. (2015), Social Media in the Service of Territorial Reintegration in the post-Soviet Area, [in:] W. Schreiber and M. Kosienkowski (eds.), Digital Eastern Europe, Wrocław: The Jan Nowak Jezioranski College of Eastern Europe.

Kosienkowski M. and Ženková Rudincová K. (2024), Client De Facto States and Quasi-Patrons: Insights From the Relationship Between Somaliland and Ethiopia, Ethnopolitics, no. 2, pp. 152–172, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2121470.

Kursani S. (2021), Reconsidering the Contested State in Post-1945 International Relations: An Ontological Approach, International Studies Review, no. 3, pp. 752–778, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa073.

Lowe P. (2015), Lessening Sensitivity: Student Experiences of Teaching and Learning Sensitive Issues, Teaching in Higher Education, no. 1, pp. 119–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957272.

Miralles P. and Ibagón N.J. (2022), Historical Thinking and Controversial Issues in Social Studies Education, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 65–80.

Niens U., O’Connor U. and Smith A. (2013), Citizenship Education in Divided Societies: Teachers’ Perspectives in Northern Ireland, Citizenship Studies, no. 1, pp. 128–141, https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.716214.

Ortega-Sánchez D. (ed.) (2022a), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer.

Ortega-Sánchez D. (2022b), Teaching Controversial Issues and Social Problems from an Integrated Perspective, [in:] D. Ortega-Sánchez (ed.), Controversial Issues and Social Problems for an Integrated Disciplinary Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 1–8.

Ó Beacháin D., Comai G. and Tsurtsumia-Zurabashvili A. (2016), The Secret Lives of Unrecognised States: Internal Dynamics, External Relations, and Counter-Recognition Strategies, Small Wars & Insurgencies, no. 3, pp. 440–466, https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1151654.

Pegg S. (1998), International Society and the De Facto State, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Pegg S. (2017), Twenty Years of de Facto State Studies, [in:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, pp. 1–30, 27 July, https:// www.oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-516 [accessed: 10.04.2022].

Quaynor L.J. (2012), Citizenship Education in Post-conflict Contexts: A Review of the Literature, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, no. 1, pp. 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197911432593.

Sætra E. (2021), Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Elements of Good Practice, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, no. 2, pp. 345–357, https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1705897.

Socor V. (2019), Transnistrian Voting Raid: A Bad Precedent for Moldova and Other Conflict Theaters, Eurasia Daily Monitor, no. 33, https://jamestown.org/program/transnistrian-voting-raid-a-bad-precedent-for-moldova-and-other-conflict-theaters/ [accessed: 29.10.2024].

Stitzlein S.M. (2022), Divisive Concepts in Classrooms: A Call to Inquiry, Studies in Philosophy and Education, no. 6, pp. 595–612, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09842-8.

Stradling R. (1984), The Teaching of Controversial Issues: An Evaluation, Educational Review, no. 2, pp. 121–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191840360202.

Zembylas M. and Bekerman Z. (2012), Teachers’ Views about Forgiveness in Israel and Cyprus: Mapping the Prospects of Forgiveness as an Educational Goal, Educational Review, no. 1, pp. 99–114, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.578733.