Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the Paradox of Deontology: Response to Wójtowicz

Łukasz Dominiak; Igor Wysocki

doi:10.18290/rf25731.11

Published : 2025-03-31

Vol. 73 No. 1 (2025)

Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the Paradox of Deontology: Response to Wójtowicz

Łukasz Dominiak

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6192-8468

Igor Wysocki

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-4010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf25731.11

Abstract

The present paper addresses a minarchist criticism of anarcho-capitalism based on the so-called paradox of deontology. The paper argues that minarchists are right in contending that minarchism does not run into a contradiction by recognizing individual rights and at the same time allowing their violations by the minimal state. However, the minarchist idea that the existence of the minimal state might be justified due to the paradox of deontology in which anarcho-capitalism is allegedly entangled is rejected. The whole discussion is conducted in the context of the exchange between Stanisław Wójtowicz’s rendition of the minarchist position as expressed in his recent paper “Libertarianism, Individual Rights, and the Paradox of Deontology: Rejoinder to Dominiak and Wysocki on Minarchism” (this issue) and Łukasz Dominiak and Igor Wysocki’s defense of anarcho-capitalism as presented in the target paper of Wójtowicz’s rejoinder, “The Anarcho-Capitalist Case against the State as a Challenge to the Minarchist Libertarians”, published also in Roczniki Filozoficzne recently.

Keywords:

libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, minarchism, paradox of deontology

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Broome, John. 2013. Rationality Through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Burtoft, Shawn. 2020. “The Paradox of Deontology and Agent-Centered Restrictions.” Philosophia 48 (5): 1801–6.

Dominiak, Łukasz. 2017. “The Blockian Proviso and the Rationality of Property Rights.” Libertarian Papers 9 (1): 114–28.

Dominiak, Łukasz, and Igor Wysocki. 2022. “The Anarcho-Capitalist Case against the State as a Challenge to the Minarchist Libertarians.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (2): 53–69.

Dominiak, Łukasz, and Igor Wysocki. 2023. “Libertarianism, Defense of Property, and Absolute Rights.” Analiza i Egzystencja 61 (1): 5–26.

Hart, Herbert. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hohfeld, Wesley N. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23 (1): 16–59.

Hohfeld, Wesley N. 1917. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 26:710–70.

Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2010. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Auburn: Mises Institute.

Kinsella, Stephan. 2008. Against Intellectual Property. Auburn: Mises Institute.

Kinsella, Stephan. 1996. “Punishment and Proportionality: The Estoppel Approach.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 12 (1): 51–73.

Kolodny, Niko, and John Brunero. 2023. “Instrumental Rationality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Article published February 13, 2013; last modified February 5, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/rationality-instrumental.

Kramer, Matthew H. 2002. “Rights Without Trimmings.” In A Debate Over Rights, edited by Matthew H. Kramer, Nigel E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, 7–112. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kramer, Matthew H. 2009. “Consistency Is Hardly Ever Enough: Reflections on Hillel Steiner’s Methodology.” In Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges, edited by Stephen de Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer, and Ian Carter, 201–13. New York: Routledge.

Kramer, Matthew H. 2005. “Moral Rights and the Limits of the Ought-Implies-Can Principle: Why Impeccable Precautions Are No Excuse.” Inquiry 48 (4): 307–55.

Kramer, Matthew H. 2014. Torture and Moral Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Oxford University Press.

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rothbard, Murray N. 1998. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 1988. Moral Dilemmas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Steiner, Hillel. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Steiner, Hillel. 2002. “Working Rights.” In A Debate Over Rights, edited by Matthew H. Kramer, Nigel E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, 233–301. New York: Oxford University Press.

Thomson, Judith J. 1990. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Bernard. 1973. “Ethical Consistency.” In Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972, 166–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2025. “Libertarianism, Individual Rights, and the Paradox of Deontology: Rejoinder to Dominiak and Wysocki on Minarchism.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 73 (1): 171–88.

Wójtowicz, Stanisław, Łukasz Dominiak, and Igor Wysocki. 2024. “A Duty to Rescue and Its Cost.” Analiza i Egzystencja 65 (1): 91–124.