Articles that are appropriate for the journal are sent to two independent referees for blind review. In case of doubts or serious differences between the reviewer’s reports, further reviewers may be asked for advice. Final decisions regarding publication are made by the Editoral Committee.

Peer reviewers are experts in their field who are not part of the author’s institution.

The manuscript should not contain references to other works of the author which might make it possible to identify him. Authors whose texts contain such references are asked to remove them from the initial version of their submission. They can be incorporated later in the final version that will be sent after their text has been accepted for publication.

When revision of a manuscript is requested, authors should return the revised version of their manuscript as soon as possible. Authors will receive a pdf file with the edited version of their manuscript for final proofreading.

Editors will publish reviewers' name in the last number for a given year.

Click here to download the review form.

Submitted texts are not sent to reviewers who are affiliated with the author's research institution, or to persons who may have a conflict of interest with the author. A conflict of interest is understood as professional dependence (subordination), direct scientific cooperation, or direct personal relationships (consanguinity up to second degree, marriage) between the reviewer and the author of the reviewed text. Reviewers may not be members of the Editorial Team (i.e. the editor-in-chief, vice editor-in-chief, and the managing editor). When the number of available specialists in a particular field of philosophical or other studies is very limited, however, we allow exceptions to the said rules.