Published : 2024-12-30

Are Non-Believers Guilty of Their Lack of Faith? Theist Responds to the Theist

Ewa Odoj



Abstract

In the article I discuss Richard Mordarski’s defense of theism against the so-called divine hiddenness argument by John L. Schellenberg. I aim to show that theists are not justified in claiming that there are certainly no nonresistant nonbelievers. My argument relies primarily on epistemological analyses, and I pay particular attention to the process of acquiring religious beliefs (and more broadly, worldview beliefs) through the testimony of a witness or authority. Among other things, I argue that if we consider the average Christian to be cognitively reliable, then we cannot exclude the possibility that the modern atheist, living in a secularized Western society, is also cognitively reliable.

Keywords:

Schellenberg, divine hiddenness, nonresistant nonbelievers, testimony, the epistemology of religion



Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Altmetric indicators


Cited by / Share


Roczniki Filozoficzne · ISSN 0035-7685 | eISSN 2450-002X
© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)