Law and Freedom

Sonja Lavaert

doi:10.18290/rf24723.1

Published : 2024-09-27

Vol. 72 No. 3 (2024)

Law and Freedom

Sonja Lavaert

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-2338

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf24723.1

Abstract

In this article, the focus will first be on the distinction Spinoza makes in his Tractatus theologico-politicus on the different strivings of human beings and the two different conceptions of law—natural and ad arte—in relation to freedom. Proceeding from these distinctions and Spinoza’s objective with his philosophical enquiries, I will then consider whether a change occurs between the earlier TTP and the later unfinished Tractatus politicus. Both texts are marked by a naturalist turn, the indifference of religion, moral neutrality, the identification of right and power and the denial of natural hierarchy, but nonetheless one can also observe a change in the TP, where the naturalistic premise is more explicit, the human condition more on the forefront and the use of the concepts more precise; the ‘people’, for example, are replaced by the ‘multitude’. In search of sources and aspects for the naturalist turn and the specific conceptual evolution between the TTP and TP, we will consider the example of Machiavelli (and thereafter of Lucretius), De la Court’s notion of a free republic building on Machiavelli and the revolutionary ideas of Van den Enden aimed at improving on his predecessor. The different aspects linked to the use of the concept of multitude in the TP will then be analyzed in relation to the sources and aspects mentioned so as to return to the initial questions concerning law and freedom.

Keywords:

Spinoza, Machiavelli, Lucretius, De la Court, Van den Enden, free republic, democracy, naturalist turn, virtù, potential, free multitude

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Anonymus [Hubert Languet]. Vindiciae contra tyrannos: sive, de Principis in Populum, Populique in Principem legitime potestate. Stephano Junio Bruto Celta Auctore. Edinburgh, 1579. Published also in Nicolai Machiauelli Florentini Princeps. Frankfurt, Zetzner, 1608.

Bertelli, Sergio. “Noterelle machiavelliane: un codice di Lucrezio e Terenzio.” Rivista storica italiana 73 (1961): 544–53.

Bertelli, Sergio. “Ancora su Machiavelli e Lucrezio.” Rivista storica italiana 76 (1964): 774–79.

Brown, Alisson. The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.

Catalogus van de bibliotheek der Vereniging Het Spinozahuis te Rijnsburg. Leiden: Brill, 1965.

Chaui, Marilena. “La plèbe et le vulgaire dans le Tractatus politicus.” In Spinoza et la politique, edited by Humberto Giannini, Pierre-François Moreau, and Patrice Vermeren, 95–118. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997.

Court, Johan/Pieter de la. Consideratien en exempelen van staat, Omtrent De Fundamenten van allerley regeringe. Beschreven door V. H. Amsterdam: Ian Iacobsz Dommekracht, 1660.

Court, Johan de la, and Pieter de la Court. Consideratien van Staat, Ofte Politike Weeg-Schaal beschreven door VH. Amsterdam: Iacob Volckerts, 1661.

Court, Johan de la, and Pieter de la Court. Politike discoursen, handelende in ses onderscheide boeken van Steeden, Landen, Oorlogen, Kerken, Regeeringen en Zeeden. Beschreven door D.C. Leiden: Pieter Hakius, 1662.

Enden, Franciscus van den. Kort verhael van Nieuw-Nederlants Gelegentheit, Deughden, Natuerlijke Voorrechten, en byzondere bequaemheidt ter Bevolkingh. N.p., 1662.

Enden, Franciscus van den. Vrye Politijke Stellingen, en Consideratien van Staat. Amsterdam: Pieter Arentsz. Raep, 1665.

Enden, Franciscus van den. Vrije Politijke Stellingen. Edited by Wim Klever. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek, 1992.

Ginzburg, Carlo. Nondimanco. Machiavelli, Pascal. Milan: Adelphi, 2018.

Koerbagh, Adriaan. Een Bloemhof van allerley lieflijkheyd sonder verdriet, geplant door Vreederyk Waarmond &c. Amsterdam: n.p., 1668.

Lavaert, Sonja. Democratic Thought from Machiavelli to Spinoza. Translated by Albert Gootjes. Edinburgh: EUP, 2024.

Lavaert, Sonja. Het perspectief van de multitude. Agamben, Machiavelli, Negri, Spinoza, Virno. Brussel: VUBPress, 2011.

Lavaert, Sonja. “Passive Tolerance versus Political Engagement. Antistius Constans, Koerbagh, Van den Enden, and Spinoza.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 70, no. 4 (2022): 302–4.

Lavaert, Sonja. Vrijheid, gelijkheid, veelheid. Het moderne democratie-denken van Machiavelli tot Spinoza en zijn kring. Brussel: VUBPress, 2020.

Lavaert, Sonja, and Pierre-François Moreau, eds. Spinoza et la politique de la multitude. Paris: Kimé, 2021.

Lavaert, Sonja, And Winfried Schröder, Eds. The Dutch Legacy. Radical Thinkers Of The 17th Century And The Enlightenment. Boston: Brill, 2017.

Lucretius (Titus Lucretius Carus). De Rerum Natura. Ms. Vat. Ross. 884. Https://Digi. Vatlib.It/View/MSS_Ross.884.

Lucretius (Titus Lucretius Carus). Over De Natuur. Translated By Aegidius W. Timmerman, Edited By Piet H. Schrijvers. Amsterdam: Atheneum-Polak & Van Gennep, 1984.

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Nicolai Machiauelli Florentini Princeps &C. Frankfurt: Lazarus Zetzner, 1608.

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Tutte le opere di Nicolo Machiavelli. N.p., 1550 [1610-1629].

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Opere 1. Edited by Corrado Vivanti. Turin: Einaudi-Gallimard, 1997.

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Opere 3. Edited by Corrado Vivanti. Turin: Einaudi, 2005.

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Chief Works and Others. Translated by Allan Gilbert. 3 vols. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1965.

Negri, Antonio. L’anomalia selvaggia. Saggio su potere e potenza in Baruch Spinoza. Milan: Feltrinelli, 1981.

Negri, Antonio. “Reliqua desiderantur. Congettura per una definizione del concetto di democrazia nell’ultimo Spinoza.” Studia Spinozana 1 (1985): 143–81.

Negri, Antonio. Spinoza sovversivo. 1992. Republished in the collection Spinoza, 286–378. Rome: DerriveApprodi, 1998.

Panichi, Alessio. “At the Root of an Ongoing Debate: Machiavelli, Lucretius, and the Rossiano 884.” Culture del testo e del document 19, no. 56 (2018): 5–32.

Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. Hamburg: Henricus Künrath, Jan Rieuwertsz, 1670.

Spinoza, Benedictus de. Opera posthuma. Amsterdam, 1677. Facsimile edited by Pina Totaro. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2008.

Spinoza, Benedictus de. De Nagelate Schriften. Amsterdam, 1677.

Spinoza, Benedictus de. The Collected Works of Spinoza. 2 vols. Edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985, 2016.

Van Binsbergen, Thomas. Spinoza, Critique and Freedom. The Tractatus Theologico-Politicus and its Contemporary Readers. PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2024.

Visentin, Stefano. La libertà necessaria. Teoria e pratica della democrazia in Spinoza. Pisa: ETS, 2001.

Visentin, Stefano. “Between Machiavelli and Hobbes: The Republican Ideology of Johan and Pieter De la Court.” In The Dutch Legacy. Radical Thinkers of the 17th Century and the Enlightenment, edited by Sonja Lavaert and Winfried Schröder, 227–48. Boston: Brill, 2017.

Weststeijn, Arthur. Commercial Republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age. The Political Thought of Johan & Pieter de la Court. Leiden: Brill, 2012.