Published : 2025-03-31

Libertarianism, Individual Rights, and the Paradox of Deontology: Rejoinder to Dominiak and Wysocki on Minarchism

Abstract

Dominiak and Wysocki criticise the minarchist position as being based on the simple fallacy of trying to combine irreconcilable positions: that the violation of rights is impermissible and that the existence of the state (which by its very nature violates rights) is permissible. In this text I argue that the minarchist position should be conceptualised in terms of a deontological paradox, which makes it far from trivial. I then outline an argument suggesting that in a particular version of the deontological paradox, where the choice is between a minimal state that produces fewer violations and anarcho-capitalism that produces more violations, libertarians might be inclined to think that it is permissible to violate the non-aggression principle. In conclusion, I argue that there is no obstacle to considering minarchism as a full-fledged part of libertarianism, although this depends on theoretical-empirical arguments showing that anarcho-capitalism would produce more violations of individual rights than a minimal state.

Keywords:

libertarianism, paradox of deontology, minarchism, anarcho-capitalism, rights



Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators


Cited by / Share


Roczniki Filozoficzne · ISSN 0035-7685 | eISSN 2450-002X
© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)