The Religious Basis of Contemporary Law

Michał Najman

doi:10.18290/kip2024.6

Published : 2024-06-26

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024)

The Religious Basis of Contemporary Law

Michał Najman

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8207-8458

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/kip2024.6

Abstract

Religion and law intermingled and influenced each other both in the early stages of the formation of society and in the subsequent processes of its development. It is impossible to say unequivocally which of the two developed earlier or which had a greater influence on the modern form of the other. Today, questions concerning the relationship between law and religion are rarely the subject of research. The prevailing view that proclaims the secularisation of law, while undoubtedly justified, seems to overlook the religious origins of many modern secular institutions of law, such as, equality before the law, social policy, parental authority or the posthumous protection of human corpses and graves. As it seems, the move away from religious justification of legal institutions is a valid solution, prompting legal scholarship to seek explanations for the functioning of the legal system. The purpose of this article is to point out that law and religion intermingled in the creation of their final forms, resulting in the spread of legal institutions derived from norms of a religious nature. This encourages the creation (or denotation) of legally protected values and the search for their scientific (non-religious) basis.

Keywords:

law, religion, religious basis of law

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Michał Najman, Extracode Circumstances Excluding Criminal Liability for Indignity a Human Corpse or Grave , Kościół i Prawo: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023)

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Najman, M. (2024). The Religious Basis of Contemporary Law. Kościół I Prawo, 13(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.18290/kip2024.6

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Allalyev, Ruslan. 2018. “Religious origins of the rule of law conception in the United States.” Amazonia Investiga 7(14):212-17.

Berger, Ludwig, and Thomas Luckman. 2010. Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Warszawa: PWN.

Berman, Joshua. 2008. Created Equal: How the Bible Broke with Ancient Political Thought. London: Oxford University Press.

Bojarski, Władysław. 1999. “Czy homo religious?: geneza religijna kodeksów praw antycznych.” Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Historia 31(330):7-12.

Borucka-Arctowa, Maria. 1981. Świadomość prawna a planowe zmiany społeczne. Wrocław: PAN.

Broda, Marian. 2009. “II. European civilization, the sacrality and secularity: Between sacrum and prophanum: Authority, knowledge, democracy.” LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics 2:116-25.

Bront, Jerzy, and Barbara Nowacka. 2008. Różnorodność związków małżeńskich na świecie. Krynica Morska: Laterna.

Burgoński, Piotr. 2014. “Modele relacji między religią i polityką.” In Religia i polityka. Zarys problematyki, eds. Piotr Burgoński, and Michał Gierycz, 216-39. Warsaawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.

Cochrane, Susan. 1975. “Children as By-products, Investment Goods and Consumer Goods: A Review of Some Micro-economic Models of Fertility”. Population Studies 29, no. 3:373-90.

Diertrich, Frank, 2021. “Critical Reflection and the Limits of Parental Authority.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 39, no. 4:562-80.

Durkheim, Emile. 1990. Elementarne formy życia religijnego: system totemiczny w Australii. Warszawa: PWN.

Echrlich, Eugen. 1912. “Żywe prawo ludów Bukowiny.” https://jbc.bj.uj.edu.pl/ Content/368030/PDF/NDIGCZAS017172_1912_005.pdf [accessed: 07.12.2023].

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4:887-917.

Grief, Avner, and Guido Tabellini. 2015. “The Clan and the Corporation: Sustaining Cooperation in China and Europe.” Journal of Comparative Economics 45, no. 1:1-35.

Hacker, Daphna. 2015. “The rights of the dead through the prism of Israeli succession disputes.” International Journal of Law in Context 1(3):40-58.

Hechter, Michael, and Karl-Dieter Opp (eds.). 2001. Social norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hill, Peter, 2018. “The Ideological Origins of the Rule of Law.” sol3/paperpp.cfm? abstract_id=3166294 [accessed: 30.11.2023].

Iwicka, Renata. 2018. Źródła klasycznej demonologii japońskiej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.

Jakimowicz-Shah, Marta, and Andrzej Jakimowicz. 1982. Mitologia indyjska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo. Artystyczne i Filmowe.

Johansson, Therese, Joakim Hjältén, Johnny de Jong, and Henrik von Stedingk. 2013. “Environmental considerations from legislation and certification in managed forest stands: A review of their importance for biodiversity.” Forest Ecology and Management 303:98-112.

Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kieniewicz, Jan. 1980. Historia Indii. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo im. Ossolińskich.

Koszowski, Maciej. 2019. Dwadzieścia osiem wykładów ze wstępu do prawoznawstwa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CM.

Le Brass, Gabriel. 1956. “Sociologie religieuse et science des religions.” Archives de Sociologie des Religions 1:3-17.

Litewski, Wiesław. 2003. Prawo Rzymskie Prywatne. Warszawa: PWN.

Löytömäki, Stiina. 2014. Law and the Politics of Memory. Confronting the Past. Cheshire: Routledge.

Makarewicz, Juliusz. 2009. Wstęp do filozofii prawa karnego. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Młynarska-Sobaczewska, Anna. 2013. “Trzy wymiary prywatności. Sfera prywatna i publiczna we współczesnym prawie i teorii społecznej.” Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 1(13):33-52.

Montgomery, Jonathan. 1988. “Children as property?” The Modern Law Review 51, no. 3:323-42.

Najman, Michał. 2021. “Determinants of the Object of Protection of the Crime of Desecration of a Corpse and a Grave and Defamation of a Deceased Person.” Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem (3)1: 241-54.

Nanji, Amin, and Samuel French. 1985. “Relationship between pork consumption and cirrhosis.” Diet and Disease 325(23):681-83.

Nowacka, Weronika. 2016. “Gdzie kończy się sacrum a zaczyna profanum. Antropologiczna analiza problemu na przykładzie przestrzeni cmentarnej.” Pracownia kultury, no. 9, www.laboratoriumkultury.upp.edu.pl/?p=31244 [accessed: 30.08.2023].

Oosten, Jarich. 1985. “Cultural Anthropological Approaches.” In Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Religion. Religion and Reason, ed. Frank Whaling, 351-84. Amsterdam: De Gruyter.

Partridge, Ernest. 1981. “Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect.” Ethics 91, no. 2:243-64.

Plavoet, Veerle. 2020. “The attribution of limited legal personality to nonhuman species.” Journal of animal ethics 10(1):49-58.

Popiołek, Piotr. 2019. “Czy chrześcijanin powinien być bogaty?”. Magazyn kontakt, 29th of December 2019, https://magazynkontakt.pl/czy-chrzescijanin-powinien-byc-bogaty/ [accessed: 30.11.2023].

Purvis, Dara. 2014. “The Origin of Parental Rights: Labor, Intent, and Fathers.” Florida State University Review 645:645-96.

Quéma, Anne. 2015. Power and Legitimacy. Law, culture, and literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Romejko, Adam. 2017. “Religia a troska o ochronę środowiska naturalnego.” Studia Gdańskie, vol XII, 247-61.

Russell, Bertrand. 2005. “On denoting.” Mind, vol. 114 (456):873-87.

Skory, Maciej. 2019. “Osobowość prawna w sferze stosunków gospodarczych – wybrane zagadnienia konstrukcyjne.” In Osobowość prawna jako przesłanka wykonywania konstytucyjnych wolności i praw, eds. Michał Bernaczyk, and Mariusz Jabłoński, 161-78. Wrocław: Prace Naukowe Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Stephenson, Barry. 2015. Ritual. A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stępień, Martyna. 2019. “Istota władzy rodzicielskiej.” Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne 27:61-71.

Vered, Ronit. 2010. “Prescribing pork in Israel.” Gastronomica 10, no. 3:19-22.

Vial-Dumas, Manuel. 2014. “Parents, Children, and Law.” Journal of Family History 4:307-29.

Wesoły, Waldemar. 2010. “Dlaczego Kościół broni własności prywatnej?” Studia Gdańskie, vol. XXVII, 232-344.

Whitehouse, Harvey. 2002. “Modes of religiosity: towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14, no. 3-4:293-315.

Woodhouse, Barbara. 1992. “Who Owns the Child?” William & Mary Law Review 33:995-1122.

Zhao, Bao. 2014. “Posthumous Reputation and Posthumous Privacy in China: The Dead, the Law, and Social Transition.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 39, no. 1:270-352.

Ziembiński, Zygmunt. 1996. Sprawiedliwość społeczna jako pojęcie prawne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.

Zirk-Sadowski, Marek. 2021. Wprowadzenie do filozofii prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwers.