Published : 2018-03-27

Grimm Wisdom

Paul O’Grady



Abstract

Wisdom has not been widely discussed in analytical epistemology. An interesting recent analysis comes from Stephen Grimm who argues that wisdom requires knowledge and that the traditional dichotomy between theoretical and practical wisdom doesn’t hold. I note a tension between these aspects of his work. He wishes to maintain that traditional exemplars of wisdom (such as Jesus, Buddha, Confucius) may still be termed ‘wise’ by his theory. But his knowledge condition seems to require that only a subset of those who hold conflicting views are really wise. I consider a number of possible responses to this and endorse a non-indexical contextualist approach which will allow the knowledge condition and also allow the traditional exemplars to be termed ‘wise’.

Keywords:

wisdom, analytical epistemology, Stephen Grimm



Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

O’Grady, P. (2018). Grimm Wisdom. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 66(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2018.66.1-4

Altmetric indicators


Cited by / Share


Roczniki Filozoficzne · ISSN 0035-7685 | eISSN 2450-002X
© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)