Intellectus Quaerens Fidem: Georges Florovsky on the Relation between Philosophy and Theology

Paweł Rojek

doi:10.18290/rf.2016.64.4-8

Published : 2016-12-30

Vol. 64 No. 4 (2016)

Intellectus Quaerens Fidem: Georges Florovsky on the Relation between Philosophy and Theology

Paweł Rojek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2016.64.4-8

Abstract

In this paper I take a closer look at Fr. Georges Florovsky’s original view on the relation between philosophy and theology. I argue that he tried to formulate an approach based on patristic experience and opposed to the dominating secular paradigm of philosophy. In some sense he wanted to reverse the traditional account. As Teresa Obolevitch aptly suggested, he wanted to replace the principle fides quaerens intellectum by the rule intellectus quaerens fidem. In that first default case the faith needs to be justified or proved by the reason, in the second, unobvious one, the faith has an absolute priority and illuminates itself the natural thought. According to Florovsky, philosophy should not attempt to ground the theology, formulating arguments for the existence of God or proving the coherence of theism, but rather should accept theology as a fundamental premise and then develop a new, non-secular account for the old philosophical topics.

Keywords:

Florovsky, Christian philosophy, Post-Secularism

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Rojek, P. (2016). Intellectus Quaerens Fidem: Georges Florovsky on the Relation between Philosophy and Theology. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 64(4), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2016.64.4-8

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Baker, Matthew. “Offenbarung, Philosophie, und Theologie: Karl Barth and Georges Florovsky in dialogue.” Scottish Journal of Theology 68 (2015): 299–326.

Barth, Karl, and Eduard Thurneysen. Karl Barth–Eduard Thurneysen Briefwechsel. Vol. 3: 1930–1935. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2000.

Blane, Andrew (ed.). Georges Florovsky: Russian Intellectual and Orthodox Churchman. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1993.

Ermishin, Oleg T. “Neizvestnaya stat’ya G.V. Florovskogo v kontekste sovremennoy filosofskoy teologii.” Filosofskie Nauki 10 (2013): 93–99.

Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, edited by Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.

Florovskiy, Georgiy V. “Bogoslovskiye otryvki.” Put’ 31 (1931): 3–29.

Florovskiy, Georgiy V. “Filosofiya i religiya.” Filosofskie Nauki 10 (2013): 100–05.

Florovsky, Georges. “Revelation, Philosophy and Theology,” translated by Richard Haugh. In Collected Works of Georges Florovsky, Vol. 3: Creation and Redemption, 21–40. Belmont, Mass.: Nordland Publishing Company, 1976.

Florowskij, Georgij. “Offenbarung, Philosophie und Theologie.” Zwischen den Zeiten 9 (1931): 463–80.

Gavrilyuk, Paul L. “Harnack’s hellenized Christianity or Florovsky’s Sacred Hellenism: Questioning two metanarratives of early Christian engagement with late Antique culture.” St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 54 (2010): 323–44.

Hick, John. Arguments for the Existence of God. London: Macmillan, 1971.

Kahn, Charles H. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Lobkowicz, Nikolaus. “Was ist eine Person?” In Sozialethik und politische Bildung: Festschrift für Bernhard Sutor zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Karl Graf Ballestrem, Hans Buchheim, Manfred Hättich, and Heinz Hürten, 39–52. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1995.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Mrovchinskiy-Van Аllen, Аrtur, and Sebast’yan Montel’ Gomes. “Аspekty russkoy traditsii filosofsko-teologicheskogo sinteza v postsekulyarnom kontekste: o. G. Florovskiy, o. S. Bulgakov, А. Bad’yu i ‘karlik teologii.’” In Sofiologiya i neopatristicheskiy sintez: bogoslovskiye itogi filosofskogo razvitiya, edited by Konstantin Аntonov and Nataliya Vaganova, 211–224. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo PSTGU, 2013.

Obolevitch, Teresa. “Faith and Knowledge in the Thought of Georges Florovsky.” In Faith and Reason in Russian Thought, edited by Teresa Obolevitch and Paweł Rojek, 197–218. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press, 2015.

Obolevitch, Teresa. Filozofia rosyjskiego renesansu patrystycznego: o. Gieorgij Fłorowski, Włodzimierz Łosski i inni. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press, 2014.

Obolevitch, Teresa. “Gieorgija Fłorowskiego krytyka rosyjskiego renesansu religijno-filozoficznego: próba oceny.” Logos i Ethos 38 (2015): 59–80.

Ratzinger, Joseph. “Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology,” translated by Michael Waldstein. Communio 17 (1990): 439–54.

Ratzinger, Joseph. Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life, translated by Michael Waldstein. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1988.

Rojek, Paweł. “Onomatodoxy and the Problem of Constitution: Florensky on Scientific and Manifest Images of the World.” In: Faith and Reason in Russian Thought, edited by Teresa Obolevitch and Paweł Rojek, 127–59. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press, 2015.

Rojek, Paweł. “Rosyjska filozofia teologiczna.” In Rosyjska metafizyka religijna, edited by Teresa Obolevitch and Wojciech Kowalski, 23–44. Tarnów: Biblos, 2009.

Rojek, Paweł. “The Logic of Palamism.” In Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking, edited by Andrew Schumann, 38–80. Hausenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 2013.