Published : 2015-03-31

Pierre Chanet, Polemicist and Philosopher of Instinct and Marin Cureau de la Chambre: The Story of a Dispute

Tomasz Stegliński



Abstract

Pierre Chanet (1603-1660) was a Protestant physician and philosopher from La Rochelle. In his research, he dealt with the problem of thinking among animals. He spoke against the tradition represented by Charon and Montaigne, which  declared that animals think, decide and posses intellect. He contrasted that with his concept of instinct. He understood the instinct as God's action and defined it as “a direction of the first cause which carries and brings all secondary causes to their end, when they have no rational faculties to do so.” Martin Cureau de la Chambre (1594-1669), who was also a doctor and philosopher, argued with him. He claimed that the intellect is not only the property of humans, but also occurred in animals’ behavior. This article presents the main arguments of the polemic between these two scientists. It also shows the essential difference between them which concerns the phrase “creating.” Chanet understood it as constantly occurring in nature, de la Chambre as once done. According to Chanet, God supports everything which He created by His intellect. In nature, this activity occurs as instinct. In de la Chambre’s view, God doesn’t interfere in such a way.

Keywords:

instinct, reason, soul, god, animal, human, speech, freedom



Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Stegliński, T. (2015). Pierre Chanet, Polemicist and Philosopher of Instinct and Marin Cureau de la Chambre: The Story of a Dispute. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 61(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2015.63.1-5

Altmetric indicators


Cited by / Share


Roczniki Filozoficzne · ISSN 0035-7685 | eISSN 2450-002X
© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)