Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank

Teresa Obolevitch

doi:10.18290/rf237102.7

Published : 2023-06-28

Vol. 71 No. 2 (2023)

Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank

Teresa Obolevitch

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-6142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf237102.7

Abstract

The article contains a comparative analysis of the thought of Russian émigré philosopher Semen Frank and one of the most prominent representatives of process philosophy and theology Charles Hartshorne. Among the points of convergence, their integral vision of reality was pointed out. Frank’s and Hartshorne’s approaches to the question of cognition of God were considered, with special attention paid to their interpretation of the ontological proof. Hartshorne was familiar with Russian thought and even wrote reviews on Zenkovsky and Lossky’s classic books on the history of Russian philosophy, where he mentioned Frank more than once. One cannot speak of the two thinkers’ influence on each other, but rather of a common philosophical heritage going back to Plato.

Keywords:

Semen Frank, Charles Hartshorne, process philosophy, integrality, all-unity, ontological proof

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Alfred North Whitehead. Essays on His Philosophy. Edited by George L. Kline. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

Boyd, Greg A. Trinity and Process: A Critical Evaluation and Reconstruction of Hartshorne’s Di-polar Theism Towards a Trinitarian Metaphysics. New York: Peter Lang, 1992.

Copleston, Frederick. Philosophy in Russia from Herzen to Lenin and Berdyaev. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.

Dombrowski, Daniel A. “Alston and Hartshorne on the Concept of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (1994): 129‒46.

Dombrowski, Daniel A. Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Dombrowski, Dan. “Charles Hartshorne.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. plato.stanford.edu/entries/hartshorne.

Frank, Semen. “Contemporary Russian Philosophy.” The Monist 37, no. 1 (1927): 1‒23.

Frank, Semen. “Mysli v strashnye dni.” In Neprochitannoe… Stat’i, pis’ma, vospominaniya, 347–93. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2001.

Frank, Semen. “Ontologicheskoe dokazatel’stvo bytiya Boga.” In Po tu storonu pravogo i levogo, 107‒51. Paris: YMCA Press, 1972.

Frank, Semen. God with Us. Three Meditations. Translated by Natalie Duddington. London: Jonathan Cape, 1946.

Frank, Semen. Predmet znaniya. Ob osnovakh i granitsakh otvlechennogo znaniya. Petrograd: Tipografiya R. G. Shredera, 1915.

Frank, Semen. Reality and Man. London: Faber & Faber, 1965.

Frank, Semen. The Light Shineth in Darkness. An Essay in Christian Ethics and Social Philosophy. Translated by Boris Jakim. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989.

Frank, Semen. The Unknowable: An Ontological Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Translated by Boris Jakim. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1983.

Frank, Semen. “Zapisnaya knizkha 1944.” Bakhmeteff Archive of Russian and East European History and Culture. Columbia University. S. L. Frank Papers. Box 15.

Frank, Simon. “Das Absolute.” Idealismus. Jahrbuch für die idealistische Philosophie der Gegenwart 1 (1934): 147‒61.

Gavrilyuk, Paul. “Natural Theology in Modern Russian Religious Thought.” In Natural Theology in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition, edited by David Bradshaw and Richard Swinburne, 89‒123. St. Paul: IOTA Publications, 2021.

Gutowski, Piotr. Filozofia procesu i jej metafilozofia. Studium metafizyki Ch. Hartshorne’a. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL, 1995.

Hartshorne, Charles. “Russian Metaphysics: Some Reactions to Zenkovsky’s History.” The Review of Metaphysics 8, no. 1 (1954): 61‒78.

Hartshorne, Charles. “Two Levels of Faith and Reason.” Journal of Bible and Religion 16, no. 1 (1948): 30–38.

Hartshorne, Charles. Anselm’s Discovery. A Re-examination of the Ontological Proof for Gods Existence. La Salle: Open Court, 1991.

Hartshorne, Charles. Letter to José Ferrater Mora, Jan. 31, 1962. Digital Repository of Universitat de Girona. Fons Ferrater Mora. dugifonsespecials.udg.edu/handle/10256.2/3489.

Hartshorne, Charles. The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in Neoclassical Metaphysics. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Company, 1962.

Kline, George L. “The Hegelian Roots of S.L. Frank’s Ethics and Social Philosophy.” The Owl of Minerva 25, no. 2 (1994): 195–208.

Kline, George L. Letters to José Ferrater Mora, Dec. 5, 1953. Digital Repository of Universitat de Girona. Fons Ferrater Mora. http://hdl.handle.net/10256.2/4254.

Obolevitch, Teresa. Wokół filozofii Siemiona Franka. Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza UZ, 2020.

Rojek, Paweł. “God and Cogito: Semen Frank on the Ontological Argument.” Studies in East European Thought 71 (2019): 119‒40.

Sia, Santiago. God in Process Thought: A Study in Charles Hartshorne’s Concept of God. Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985.

Viney, Donald. “Process Theism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-theism.

Whitehead, Alfred North. Le devenir de la religion, trans. Ph. Devaux (Paris: Aubier, Editions Montaigne, 1939).