What is Real in Virtual Reality?

Paweł Grabarczyk

doi:10.18290/rf24721.5

Published : 2024-03-27

Vol. 72 No. 1 (2024)

What is Real in Virtual Reality?

Paweł Grabarczyk

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-7474

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf24721.5

Abstract

The paper discusses the thesis of virtual realism presented by David Chalmers in his paper “The Virtual and the Real” (2017). Here, I suggest an even stronger version of the claim that I call “virtual physicalism”. According to this view, virtual objects are not only real but physical as they are identical to the physical states of computers that run VR software. I suggest that virtual objects should have a similar ontological status to toys—they should be treated as models or simplifications of ordinary objects. Just like toys, virtual objects can sometimes be good enough to be used instead of their ordinary counterparts. In these cases, virtual objects start to be treated as instantiations of the same kind. In the last part of the paper, I use Johan Huizinga’s notion of a “magic circle” to suggest how different objects could be successfully “virtualized”, that is, moved into a digital realm while remaining objects of the same kind as their non-virtual counterparts. I suggest this will happen once virtual reality becomes permanent and causally connected with non-virtual reality. I finish the paper by looking at examples of natural kind objects and individuals, which seem to be the hardest cases for successful virtualization.

Keywords:

virtual reality, ontology, virtual realism, virtual fictionalism, magic circle

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Aarseth, Espen. 2007. “Doors and Perception: Fiction vs. Simulation in Games.” Intermédialités 9:35–44.

Beisbart, Claus. 2019. “Virtual Realism: Really Realism or Only Virtually So? A Comment on D. J. Chalmers’s Petrus Hispanus Lectures.” Disputatio 11 (55): 297–331. https://doi.org/10. 2478/disp-2019-0008.

Brey, Philip. 2014. “The Physical and Social Reality of Virtual Worlds.” In The Oxford Handbook of Virtual Reality, 42–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, David J. 2017. “The Virtual and the Real.” Disputatio 9 (46): 309–52.

Chalmers, David J. 2019. “The Virtual as the Digital.” Disputatio 11 (55): 453–86.

Chalmers, David J. 2022. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. Grand Haven, MI: Brilliance Audio.

Dretske, Fred. 1999. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grabarczyk, Paweł, and Marek Pokropski. 2016. Perception of Affordances and Experience of Presence in Virtual Reality. AVANT 7 (2): 25–44.

Grabarczyk, Paweł. 2021. “Pułapki fantomatyki.” In Filozoficzny Lem, edited by Filip Kobiela and Jakub Gomułka. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.

Heim, Michael. 1998. Virtual Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Huizinga, Johan. 1949. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element of Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Juul, Jesper. 2011. Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Juul, Jesper. 2019. “Virtual Reality: Fictional All the Way Down (and That’s OK).” Disputatio 11 (55): 333–43.

Ludlow, Peter. 2019. “The Social Furniture of Virtual Worlds.” Disputatio 11 (55): 1–25.

McDonnel, Neil, and Nathan Wildman. 2019. “Virtual Reality: Digital or Fictional?” Disputatio 11 (55): 371–97.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1974. The Collected Works of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 5–6. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Robson, Jon, and Aaron Meskin. 2016. “Video Games as Self‐Involving Interactive Fictions.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2): 165–77.

Tavinor, Grant. 2022. The Aesthetics of Virtual Reality. New York: Routledge.

Walton, Kendall. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.