Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement in Terms of One’s Personality Traits: Relationships with Ruminations and Regulatory Focus

Anna Jędraszkiewicz

doi:10.18290/rpsych2024.0009

Published : 2024-07-31

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2024)

Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement in Terms of One’s Personality Traits: Relationships with Ruminations and Regulatory Focus

Anna Jędraszkiewicz

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4588-0262

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2024.0009

Abstract

While personality researchers have shown interest in studying self-enhancement, they have not extensively focused on its relationships with distinct cognitive and motivational variables. This exploratory study aims to investigate whether overestimating one’s personality traits is related to a lower level of ruminations, a higher promotion regulatory focus, and a lower prevention focus. Promotion regulatory focus involves self-regulation based on one’s striving for an ideal-self, as opposed to an ought-self, which is typical of a prevention regulatory focus. Self-enhancement occurs when the level of self-rated personality traits exceeds that of informant-rated personality traits. The Five-Factor personality traits were considered: emotional stability, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Certain hypotheses found empirical support. Self-enhancement in different traits were linked to different cognitive and motivational variables. Primarily, an overly positive self-view of one’s emotional stability was accompanied by a lower level of intrusive rumination, a higher level of promotion focus, and a lower prevention focus. The self-enhancement in extraversion was related to a higher level of promotion focus and a lower level of intrusive ruminations while self-enhancement in conscientiousness was linked to a higher promotion focus. Methodological issues and hypothesis formulation were further discussed.

Keywords:

overly positive self-view, biased self-concept, maladaptive thinking, Big Five, Higgins’ theory

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23

Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Triplett, K. N., Vishnevsky, T., & Lindstrom, C. M. (2011). Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: The Event Related Rumination Inventory. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 24(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.529901

Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.3

Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1152

Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2019). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318756467

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwith, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. de Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280

Humberg, S., Dufner, M., Schönbrodt, F. D., Geukes, K., Hutteman, R., Van Zalk, M., Denissen, J. J. A., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2017). Enhanced versus simply positive: A new condition-based regression analysis to disentangle effects of self-enhancement from effects of positivity of self-view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000134

Jędraszkiewicz, A. (2024, June 24). Individual differences in self-enhancement in terms of one’s personality traits: Relationships with ruminations and regulatory focus. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6DY4W

Kolańczyk, A., Bąk, W., & Roczniewska, M. (2013). Skala samoregulacji promocyjnej i prewencyjnej (SSPP) [Promotion and Prevention Self-Regulation Scale (PPSS)]. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 203–218.

Krueger, J. I., & Wright, J. C. (2011). Measurement of self-enhancement (and self-protection). In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 472–494). The Guilford Press.

Kurt, A., & Paulhus, D. L. (2008). Moderators of the adaptiveness of self-enhancement: Operationalization, motivational domain, adjustment facet, and evaluator. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.005

Kuster, F., Orth, U., & Meier, L. L. (2012). Rumination mediates the prospective effect of low self-esteem on depression: A five-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212437250

Lakens, D. (2022). Improving your statistical inferences. Retrieved July 16, 2024, from https://lakens.github.io/statistical_inferences. ZENODO repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zeno do.6409077

McAbee, S. T., & Connelly, B. S. (2016). A multi-rater framework for studying personality: The trait-reputation-identity model. Psychological Review, 123(5), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000035

McCrae, R. R. (2018). Method biases in single-source personality assessments. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000566

McCrae, R. R., & Mõttus, R. (2019). What personality scales measure: A new psychometrics and its implications for theory and assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419849559

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569

Ogińska-Bulik, N., & Juczyński, Z. (2015). Inwentarz Ruminacji o Negatywnym Zdarzeniu – polska adaptacja Event Related Rumination Inventory [Polish adaptation of the Event Related Rumination Inventory]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 58(3), 383–400.

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Robins, R. W., & John, O. P. (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 649–679). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50026-3

Rubin, M. (2021). When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: A consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing. Synthese, 199(3), 10969–11000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4

Schnuerch, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2023). Building the study. In A. L. Nichols & J. E. Edlund (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of research methods and statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Vol. 1: Building a program of research (pp. 103–124). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054.007

Scholer, A. A., Ozaki, Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2014). Inflating and deflating the self: Sustaining motivational concerns through self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.008

Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2019). The five pillars of self-enhancement and self-protection. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (2nd ed., pp. 307–319). Oxford University Press.

Smith, J. M., & Alloy, L. B. (2009). A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.103

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193

Veazie, P. J. (2006). When to combine hypotheses and adjust for multiple tests. Health Services Research, 41(3p1), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00512.x

Wetzel, E., Böhnke, J. R., & Brown, A. (2016). Response biases. In F. T. L. Leong, D. Bartram, F. M. Cheung, K. F. Geisinger, & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 349–363). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199356942.003.0024

Zawadzki, B., & Strelau, J. (2010). Structure of personality: Search for a general factor viewed from a temperament perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.025