Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment

Jan Przewoźnik; Adam Biela

doi:10.18290/pepsi-2024-0001

Published : 2025-04-17

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2024)

Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment

Jan Przewoźnik

Adam Biela

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-8382

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/pepsi-2024-0001

Abstract

The authors present chess players’ problem-solving in a three-move experiment. 16 advanced chess players, both men and women, participated in the experiment, which involved solving complex chess problems. The thinking aloud method was used to provide 200 pages of verbal protocols. Nine indicators were abstracted and measured: the total number of all moves considered in verbal protocol (M), the number of successive solving propositions or number of fresh starts in decision tree (branches in decision tree – N), the number of different options (A), the number of successive changes in solving propositions (nn), reinvestigations of the move considered the most (Pmax), the longest immediate reinvestigations of the move (Pser), longest variation (Dmax), the value of the move chosen (V), and thinking time (Time). These indicators can be interpreted in terms of problem-solving cognitive strategies. This paper demonstrates the methodology

Keywords:

psychology of chess, thinking aloud method, three-move-chess-playing experiment, indicators of chess player’s complex problem-solving thinking

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Przewoźnik, J., & Biela, A. (2025). Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment. Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration, 30(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.18290/pepsi-2024-0001

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Biela, A. (1986). Psychological patterns in predicting disjunction and conjunction of clinical symptoms. Acta Psychologica, 61(3), 183–195.

Biela, A. (1991). Analogy in Science. Peter Lang.

Burgoyne, A., Sala, G., Gobet, F., Macnamara, B., Campitelli, G., & Hambrick, D. (2016). The relationship between cognitive ability and chess skill: A comprehensive meta-analyses. Intelligence, 59, 72–83.

Busato, V. (2006a). In Memoriam: Adriaan Dingeman de Groot (1914-2006). Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 62, 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03061044

Busato, V. (2006b, November 1). In Memoriam: Adriaan Dingeman de Groot (1914 – 2006). Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/in-memoriam-adriaan-dingeman-de-groot-1914-2006

Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2004). Adaptive expert decision making: Skilled Chess players search more and deeper. ICGA Journal, 27(4), 209–216.

Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Charness, N. (1981a). Search in chess: Age and skill differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.2.467

Charness, N. (1981b). Aging and skilled problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(1), 21–38.

Charness, N. (1988). The role of theories of cognitive aging: Comment on Salthouse. Psychology and Aging, 3(1), 17–21.

Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.

De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. Mouton & Co.

De Groot, A. D. (1981). Thought and choice in chess: An overview of a study based on Selzean Theory. In N. Frijda & A. D. de Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology (pp. 192–255). Mouton.

Desmurget, M. (2011). TV Lobotomie. Editions Max Milo.

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C. Heath & Co., Publishers.

Glickman M., Jones, A. (1999). Rating the chess rating system. Chance, 12, 21–28.

Gliga, F., & Flesner, P. I. (2014). Cognitive benefits of chess training in novice children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 962–967. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.328

Gobet, F. (2001). Chunk hierarchies and retrieval structures: Comments on Saariluoma and Laine. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 149–155. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00225

Gobet, F., & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four… or is it two? Memory, 12(6), 732–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000530

Gobet, F. (2019). The psychology of chess. Fernand Gobet. Routledge.

Lindsay, P., & Norman, D. (1972). Human information processing. An introduction to psychology. Academic Press.

Mireles, D., & Charness, N. (2002). Computational explorations of the influence of structured knowledge on age-related cognitive decline. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.245

Przewoźnik, J. (2014). Thinking strategies in complex chess positions. Wydawnictwo KUL.

Przewoznik, J. (2019). Nine indicators to improve your chess (Parts 1 and 2). Chess Base 18. https://en.chessbase.com/post/nine-indicators-method-part-1; https://en.chessbase.com/post/nine-indicators-method-part-2

Przewonik, J., & Pein, M. (1991). The Blumenfeld Gambit. Pergamon Chess.

Przewoznik, J., & Soszynski, M. (2001). How to think in chess. Russell Enterprises.

Reingold, e. M., & Sheridan, H. (2011). Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements (pp. 528–550). Oxford University Press.

Roring, R., & Charness, N. (2007). A multilevel model analysis of expertise in chess across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 22(2), 291–299.

Saariluoma, P. (2001). Chess and content-oriented psychology of thinking. Psichologica, 22, 143–164.

Sadler, M., & Regan, N. (2019). Game changer. AlphaZero’s groundbreaking chess strategies and the promise of AI. New in Chess.

Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2016). Do the benefits of chess instruction transfer to academic and cognitive skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 18, 46–57.

Spitzer, M. (2012). Digitale Demenz: Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen. Droemer Verlag.

Timmermans, D., & Vlek, Ch. (1992). Multi-attribute decision support and complexity: An evaluation and process analysis of aided versus unaided decision making. Acta Psychologica, 80(1–3), 49–65.

Trinchero, R., & Sala, G. (2016). Chess training and mathematical problemsolving: The role of teaching heuristics in transfer of learning. Eurasial Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 655–668.