Specyfika dezadaptacyjnych przekonań w zaburzeniach osobowości: charakterystyka psychometryczna polskiej translacji i trawestacji Kwestionariusza Przekonań (Personality Beliefs Questionnaire, PBQ)

Bogdan Zawadzki, Agnieszka Popiel, Ewa Pragłowska, Cory Newman

Abstract


Specificity of dysfunctional beliefs in personality disorders: Psychometric characteristics of the Polish translation and modified version of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ)

The present analyses focused on the adaptation of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ) – a tool measuring beliefs specific to personality disorders. Two Polish versions of the PBQ were developed: a translation of the original version consisting of 126 items, and a modified version comprised of 124 items (the scale for borderline personality was made diagnostically independent; the scale for schizotypal personality was added, and the items were assigned to the scales not only on the basis of their content but also on the basis of factor analysis results). For both versions, indicators of measurement reliability and validity were obtained based on results from more than 1,600 subjects. The data showed that the scales of both versions demonstrated acceptable reliability in terms of both internal consistency and temporal stability. The values of convergent validity of the scales in both versions were comparable (correlations with scales of the SCID-II questionnaire for Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II and TALEIA-400A: Test for AxiaL Evaluation and Interview for Clinical, Personnel, and Guidance Applications, assessing personality disorders), but scales of the modified PBQ version showed better discriminant validity (its internal structure also was very clearly confirmed by the results of confirmatory factor analysis). Insufficiently high convergent validity was found for both PBQ versions, including high intercorrelations among scales. Therefore, the discussion emphasized that although the PBQ allows for the identification of specific beliefs in personality disorders, it is not a diagnostic equivalent for tools assessing disorders per se.


Keywords


core beliefs; Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ); personality disorders; diagnosis; convergent and discriminant validity

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Alford, B. A. i Beck, A. T. (1997). The integrative power of cognitive therapy. New York: The Guilford Press.

Alford, B. A. i Beck, A. T. (2005). Terapia poznawcza jako teoria integrująca psychoterapię. Tłum. M. Łamacz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

American Psychiatric Association, APA (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (rev.) (wyd. 3). Washington, DC: Autor.

American Psychiatric Association, APA (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – text revision (wyd. 4). Washington, DC: Autor.

American Psychiatric Association, APA (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (wyd. 5). Arlington, VA: Autor.

Arntz, A., Dreessen, L., Schouten, E. i Weertman, A. (2004). Beliefs in personality disorders: A test with the Personality Disorder Belief Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1215-1225.

Arntz, A. i van Genderen, H. (2016). Terapia schematów w zaburzeniu osobowości typu borderline. Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Beck, A. T. i Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. Niepublikowane narzędzie badawcze. The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research, Bala Cynwyd, PA.

Beck, A. T., Butler, A. C., Brown, G. K., Dahslgaard, K. K., Newman, C. F. i Beck, J. S. (2001). Dysfunctional beliefs discriminate personality disorders. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 39, 1213-1225.

Beck, A. T., Freeman, A. i współpracownicy (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.

Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., Davis, D. D. i współpracownicy (2005). Terapia poznawcza zaburzeń osobowości. Tłum. M. Cierpisz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Bhar, S. S., Beck, A. T. i Butler, A. C. (2012). Beliefs and personality disorders: An overview of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 88-100.

Boncori, L. (2007). TALEIA-400A: Test for AxiaL Evaluation and Interview for clinical, personnel, and guidance Applications – Manual. Trento: Erickson.

Butler, A. C., Brown, G. K., Beck, A. T. i Grisham, J. R. (2002). Assessment of dysfunctional beliefs in borderline personality disorder. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 40, 1231-1240.

Drwal, R. Ł. (1990). Problemy kulturowej adaptacji kwestionariuszy osobowości. W: A. Ciechanowicz (red.), Kulturowa adaptacja testów (s. 115-138). Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.

First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W. i Benjamin, L. S. (2010). Ustrukturalizowany Wywiad Kliniczny do Badania Zaburzeń Osobowości z Osi II DSM-IV. SCID II. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.

Fisher, R. i Milfont, T. L. (2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 88-96.

Forster, C., Berthollier, N. i Rawlinson, D. (2014). A systematic review of potential mechanisms of change in psychotherapeutic interventions for personality disorder. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 4, 133. DOI: 10.4172/2161-0487.1000133

Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J. i Beck, A. T. (2012). Dysfunctional cognitions in personality pathology: The structure and validity of the Personality Belief Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 42, 795-805.

Gorsuch, R. K. (2015). Factor analysis. Classic edition. New York: Routledge.

Konarski, R. (2009). Modele równań strukturalnych. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Leahy, R. L. (2008). Techniki terapii poznawczej. Podręcznik praktyka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Popiel, A. i Pragłowska, E. (2006). Optymalizacja – między stylem a zaburzeniem osobowości. W: M. Fajkowska, M. Marszał-Wiśniewska, G. Sędek (red.), Podpatrywanie myśli i uczuć. Zaburzenia i optymalizacja procesów emocjonalnych i poznawczych. Nowe kierunki badań (s. 258-279). Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Popiel, A. i Pragłowska, E. (2008). Psychoterapia poznawczo-behawioralna. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wyd. Paradygmat.

Raine, A. (1991). The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 555-564.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. i Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.

Schriesheim, C. A., Kopelman, R. E. i Solomon, E. (1989). The effect of grouped versus randomized questionnaire format on scale reliability and validity: A three-study investigation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 487-508.

Schuerger, J. M., Zarella, K. L. i Hotz, A. S. (1989). Factors that influence the temporal stability of personality by questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 777-783.

Trull, T. J., Goodwin, A. H., Schopp, L. H., Hillenbrand, T. L. i Schuster, T. (1993). Psychometric properties of a cognitive measure of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 536-546.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S. i Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford.

Wenzel, A., Chapman, J. E., Newman, C. F., Beck, A. T. i Brown, G. K. (2006). Hypothesized mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 503-516. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20244

Widiger, T. A. i Trull, T. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology: An application of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 60, 363-393.

Zawadzki, B. (2006). Kwestionariusze osobowości. Strategie i procedura konstruowania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2017.20.2-4pl

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Roczniki Psychologiczne/Annals of Psychology

ISSN: 1507-7888   e-ISSN: 2451-4306


© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II – Wydział Nauk Społecznych


Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)