Negative arousability and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of empathy

Ariadna Beata Łada, Maria Kaźmierczak

Abstract


Temperamental traits and empathy are both associated with emotional regulation; they thus shape both the quality of an individual’s life and the functioning of his or her social relationships. However, the mediating effects of emotional empathy in the relationship between temperamental characteristics and relationship satisfaction have not been closely analyzed and therefore require further study. This study examined the effects of temperamental arousability – global negative arousability and its components (fear, sadness, discomfort, frustration) – on emotional empathy and, consequently, on relationship satisfaction. One hundred and fifty young adults (104 women, 46 men) aged 20 to 35 participated in the study. The participants had been in romantic relationships for at least six months. The study used a sociodemographic survey and a set of questionnaires which included the Adult Temperament Questionnaire – Short Form, the Empathic Sensitiveness Scale and the RELAT Questionnaire. The results showed that empathic concern fully mediated the relationship between global negative arousability and relationship satisfaction. Furthermore, the effects of fear and sadness on relationship satisfaction were fully mediated by empathic concern and personal distress. Additionally, personal distress fully mediated the relationship between discomfort and relationship satisfaction. Neither empathic concern nor personal distress were mediators in the relationship between frustration and relationship satisfaction. It can therefore be concluded that although partners who exhibit higher global negative arousability report lower relationship satisfaction, they might become more satisfied when being more compassionate and caring towards others.


Keywords


temperament; negative arousability; empathy; relationship satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, S., & Alea, N. (2017). Does who I am or how I regulate matter? Consequences of manipulation of emotion regulation strategies. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 85(2), 135-163. DOI: 10.1177/0091415016682252

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 220-236. DOI: 10.1108/02683940910939313

Batson, C. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 16-31). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.

Batson, C. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15-34). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/12061-001

Berry, D. S., & Willingham, J. K. (1997). Affective traits, responses to conflict, and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 564-576.

Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Ferguson, E. (2016). For better or for worse: The moderating effects of personality on the marriage-life satisfaction link. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.005

Bryant, B. K. (1990). Mental health, temperament, family, and friends: Perspectives on children’s empathy and social perspective taking. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 245-270). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2006). The affective structure of marriage. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 131-155). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

Davis, M. H. (1999). Empatia. O umiejętności wpółodczuwania [Empathy. The ability to em-pathize]. Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. (1991). Dispositional empathy and social relationships. Advances in Personal Relationships, 3, 75-115.

Davis, M. H., Luce, C., & Kraus, S. J. (1994). The heritability of characteristics associated with dispositional empathy. Journal of Personality, 62(3), 369-391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00302.x

Dey, S., & Ghosh, J. (2016). Factors in the distribution of successful marriage. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 3(1), 60-64.

Eisenberg, N. (2005). Empatia i współczucie [Empathy and compassion]. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Psychologia emocji (M. Kacmajor et al., Trans.; pp. 849-867) [Psychology of emotions]. Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Eisenberg, N. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 129-148). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/12061-007

Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 71-83). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1992). Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence. In Emotion and social behavior (pp. 119-150). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

Eisenberg, N., & Okun, M. A. (1996). The relations of dispositional regulation and emotionality to elders’ empathy-related responding and affect while volunteering. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 157-183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00818.x

Eliasz, A. (1981). Temperament a system regulacji stymulacji [Temperament and the stimulation regulation system]. Warszawa, Poland: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 868-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.002

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2008). G*Power Version 3.1.2 [computer software]. Uiversität Kiel, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/download-and-register

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

Hoffman, M. L. (2003). Empathy and moral development. Implications for caring and justice. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Hoffman, M. L. (2006). Empatia i rozwój moralny (O. Waśkiewicz, Trans.). [Empathy and moral development]. Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Kaźmierczak, M. (2008). Oblicza empatii w relacjach małżeńskich [The faces of empathy in marital relationships]. Gdańsk, Poland: Wydawnictwo UG.

Kaźmierczak, M. (2015). Oblicza empatii w procesie adaptacji do rodzicielstwa [The faces of empathy in the process of adaptation to parenthood]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Kaźmierczak, M., & Plopa, M. (2012). Komunikacja w bliskich związkach. Teoria i metoda badania. [Communication in close relationships. Theory and method of research]. Warszawa, Poland: Vizja Press & IT.

Kaźmierczak, M., Plopa, M., & Retowski, S. (2007). Skala Wrażliwości Empatycznej [The Empathic Sensitiveness Scale]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 50(1), 9-24.

Kaźmierczak, M., & Rostowska, T. (2010). Percepcja relacji małżeńskich i poziom empatii partnerów a jakość życia [The perception of marital relationships and the level of partners’ empathy and the quality of life]. In T. Rostowska & A. Peplinska (Eds.), Psychospołeczne aspekty życia rodzinnego [Psychosocial aspects of family life] (pp. 110-124). Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Diffin.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284. DOI: 10.1037/a0026811

Levesque, C., Lafontaine, M.-F., Caron, A., Flesch, J. L., & Björnson, S. (2014). Dyadic empathy, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic model. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v10i1.697

Loudin, J. L., Loukas, A., & Robinson, S. (2003). Relational aggression in college students: Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggressive Behavior, 29(5), 430-439. DOI: 10.1002/ab.10039

Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 14(4), 261-292. DOI: 10.1007/BF02686918

Mehrabian, A., Young, A. L., & Sato, S. (1988). Emotional empathy and associated individual differences. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 7(3), 221-240. DOI: 10.1007/BF02686670

Melchers, M., Montag, C., Reuter, M., Spinath, F. M., & Hahn, E. (2016). How heritable is empathy? Differential effects of measurement and subcomponents. Motivation and Emotion, 40(5), 720-730.

Nadler, A., Fisher, J. D., & Streufert, S. (1976). When helping hurts: Effects of donor‐recipient similarity and recipient self‐esteem on reactions to aid1. Journal of Personality, 44, 392-409. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00129.x

Okun, M. A., Shepard, S. A., & Eisenberg, N. (2000). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional empathy-related responding among volunteers-in-training. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 367-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00107-5

Perrone-McGovern, K. M., Oliveira-Silva, P., Simon-Dack, S., Lefdahl-Davis, E., Adams, D., McConnell, J., ... Gonçalves, Ó. F. (2014). Effects of empathy and conflict resolution strategies on psychophysiological arousal and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(1), 19-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-013-9237-2

Richards, J. M., Butler, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). Emotion regulation in romantic relationships: The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), 599-620. DOI: 10.1177/02654075030205002

Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development. Vol. 3: Handbook of child psychology (pp. 105-176). New York, NY, US: Wiley.

Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Temperament and self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 357-370). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742-752. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000320

Simpson, J., Winterheld, H., & Chen, J. (2006). Personality and relationships: A temperament perspective. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 231-250). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Strelau, J. (2015). Różnice indywidualne [Individual differences]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1995). Podstawy teoretyczne, konstrukcja i własności psychometryczne inwentarza „Formalna Charakterystyka Zachowania Kwestionariusz Temperamentu” [Theoretical foundations, structure, and psychometric properties of the Formal Characteristics of Behavior – Temperament Questionnaire]. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 49-96




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2019.22.1-5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Roczniki Psychologiczne/Annals of Psychology

ISSN: 1507-7888   e-ISSN: 2451-4306


© Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II – Wydział Nauk Społecznych


Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)